SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 522

RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA
Bhola Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Kumar Malendu.
For the Respondents: Mr. Subhash Chandra Yadav-Gp-15.

Rudra Prakash Mishra, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. Following relief(s) have been prayed for in paragraph No. 1 of the writ application:—

(i) Quashing/setting aside the order dated 15.10.16 (Annexure-11) issued by the Respondent No. 4 (Addl. Collector) by which the Jamabandi No. 689 running in the name of the mother of the petitioner namely Late Munari Devi has been cancelled again vide Jamabandi Cancellation Misc. Case No. 17 of 2015-16.

(ii) Quashing/setting aside the order of settlement (Annexure-12 series) issued by the Respondent No. 7 in favour of Respondent No. 8 (Co-operative Society) which was issued without hearing the petitioner.

(iii) Holding and declaring that the whole proceedings initiated before the learned Addl. Collector (Respondent No. 4) for cancellation of Jamabandi vide order dated 15.10.16 (Annexure-11) passed by him is not only without jurisdiction but also a purposeful attempt to oust the petitioner from his khatiyani raiyati lands/tanks at the instance of some anti-social villagers.

(iv) Holding and declaring that the Respondents authorities had no jurisdiction to cancel the Jamabandi of the petitioner over th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top