Back
PURNENDU SINGH
Pankaj Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Purnendu Singh, J.—Heard Mr. Rajnandan Prasad, learned counsel along with Mr. Umesh Kumar Roy and Mr. Vikash Kumar Singh, learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Vivek Prasad, learned GP-7 along with Mr. Sudhanshu Bhushan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and Mr. Sanjay Pandey, learned counsel along with Mr. Nishant Kumar Jha, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Bihar Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as the 'B.P.S.C.' for short).
2. The petitioner in paragraph no. 1 of the present writ petition has sought inter alia following relief(s), which is reproduced hereinafter:—
“(i) Issuance of an appropriate writ including a writ in the nature of writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order notified and communicated vide memo no. Yo.Stha.03/03-03/2016 705/Yo.Pi. Patna dated 17.02.2017 passed by the respondent no. 3 (as contained an Annexure 8) whereby and whereunder it has been notified that in respect of the five charges levelled against the petitioner for which the departmental proceeding had been conducted vide notification no. 1427 dated 26.05.2009 and one charge was said to be proved and one charge was said to be partially
Disciplinary proceedings quashed for defective charge memo without imputations, documents, witnesses; no departmental evidence or witnesses; perfunctory enquiry report lacking independent reasons and....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
