SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 538

ARUN KUMAR JHA
Gul Hasan Miyan – Appellant
Versus
Aas Mohammad – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr.Ajay Kumar Pandey.
For the Respondents: M/s Ajay Mishra, Babloo Kumar Jha.

Arun Kumar Jha, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and I intend to dispose of the present petition at the stage of admission itself.

2. The instant petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 08.09.2016 passed in Title Suit No. 64 of 2014 by learned Munsif- II, Siwan whereby and whereunder the learned trial court rejected the petition dated 04.08.2016 filed by the plaintiff/petitioner under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Code’)

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is plaintiff before the learned trial court and the respondents are the defendants. The plaintiff has filed a suit for declaration of title over the suit land as mentioned in the schedule of the plaint. The matter was at the stage of plaintiff’s evidence and examination-in-chief of the plaintiff was filed and at that time, a petition for amendment under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff making a prayer for amendment in paragraph 1, 8, 13 and in the relief portion of the plaint. The learned counsel furth

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top