Back
YASHWANT VARMA
Komal Nagpal – Appellant
Versus
Sonia Bhandari – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the sale deed and subsequent events. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. key legal principles on amendments. (Para 8 , 12) |
| 3. arguments surrounding the amendment application. (Para 9 , 14 , 20) |
| 4. court’s analysis on the amendment's necessity. (Para 10 , 11 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 30) |
| 5. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 32 , 33) |
JUDGMENT
1. The instant application has been moved by the Plaintiff seeking to introduce various amendments in the plaint which has been filed in the original suit. The suit seeks a declaration that the sale deed dated 18 February 2001 conveying title upon Defendant No.1 with respect to the first floor of property bearing No. B-217, Greater Kailash-I, New Delhi-110048 [Suit Property] is liable to be declared as being null and void.
2. The case as set forth in the plaint is that the father of the Plaintiff purchased the suit property sometime in the year 1964 and constructed a house which stands thereon. The Plaintiff is alleged to have shifted out of the suit property upon her marriage in 1976. It is her case that in 1979 and upon the suit property being renovated, the second Defendant moved to the first floor from
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
