IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.
Sandeep Kumar Jha Son of Chandra Mohan Jha and ors. – Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary and ors. – Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2270 of 2024
Decided On : 29-05-2024
JUDGMENT :
Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the B.P.S.C.
2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and for the reasons stated in this interlocutory application, this I.A. No. 01/2024 is allowed and the reliefs prayed in this interlocutory application shall also be treated as a part of the relief prayed in the main writ application.
3. That the present writ application is being filed on behalf of the petitioners for the following relief(s):-
(ii) For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus a directing/commanding the respondents/authorities concerned to follow the Rule no. 6 (Merit List) of the Advertisement No. 27/2023 (Annexure -P/3) published by the BPSC (respondent no.5) for the appointment as the 'School Teacher' by which (5 marks per year and maximum 25 marks) of preference/weightage given to the employed Teacher on contract basis in Backward Class and Extreme Backward Class Welfare Department but the respondents concerned have not given 5 marks preference/weightage to the petitioners who are Guest Teacher.
(iii) Further for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing/ commanding the BPSC (respondent no.5) to publish supplementary result in favour of the Guest Teacher who are working since 5 and half years.
(iv) Further for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing/ commanding the respondents to regularize the service of the petitioners according to the 'Bihar District Board Secondary and Senior Secondary Teachers' (Employment and Service Condition) Rule, 2006' and 'Bihar Municipal/Local Bodies Secondary and Senior Secondary Teachers' (Employment and Service Condition) Rule, 2006' and not to disturb the service of the petitioners till the age of 60 years i.e. age of retirement like other teachers of the secondary/primary schools of the Government of Bihar and pay the remuneration/salary accordingly.
(v) Further for direction to the respondents concerned not to take steps with respect the petitioners to terminate them from their job.
(vi) Further for direction to the respondents concerned not to make any employment/selection/appointment in place of the petitioners.
(vii) The interlocutory application no.1 of 2024 is filed on behalf of the petitioner for granting stay on Advertisement no. 22/2024 dated 07.02.2024 (TRE-3), published by B.P S.C. and to grant (5 marks per year to maximum 25 marks) of preference/weightage in the Advertisement no. 22/2024 dated 07.02.2024 (Annexure-P/6) for the guest teachers.
(viii) For any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioners are entitled to in accordance with law.”
4. The fact of the present case, in short, is that the petitioners are working as ‘Guest Teachers’ in different subjects in different schools of different districts of Bihar and they are residing in the State of Bihar. The Education Department, Government of Bihar, came with a Resolution vide Letter No.9/Bi.Vi.Pa.Sa-09/2015 issued vide Memo No.51 dated 25.01.2018 to appoint/employ 4257 vacant posts of 'Guest Teachers' in different subjects i.e. English, Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry, Zoology and Botany on remuneration @ Rs.1000/- per day maximum Rs.25000/- in a month, in Upgraded Secondary Schools situated in Zila Parishad and Nagar Nikay of the State under Governme
Guest Teachers are entitled to the same grace marks as contractual teachers in recruitment processes, affirming equal treatment under the law.
The Memorandum dated December 23, 2019, issued by the State Government for restructuring of service conditions and other benefits of Part-Time Teachers, Contractual Whole Time Teachers, and Guest Tea....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of following due process of law, principles of natural justice, and the need for regular appointments in the recruitment and termina....
The court established that procedural errors by an authority can lead to unjust denial of rights, necessitating rectification to uphold fairness and equality.
The court emphasized the impropriety of changing selection criteria post-initiation of the selection process, upholding fair treatment in administrative decisions.
The promotion rights of teachers must be adhered to according to their respective service conditions, ensuring compliance with state regulations while respecting natural justice and constitutional pr....
Employment termination without notice violates constitutional rights to fair treatment under Articles 14, 16, and 21.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.