SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 776

P. B. BAJANTHRI, ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
Anupma Kumari – Appellant
Versus
Prabhash Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant : Mr.Ranjan Kumar Sinha.
For the Respondent: Mr. Prabhash Kumar (In Person).

Alok Kumar Pandey, J.—The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 25.02.2022 and decree dated 26.02.2022 passed in Matrimonial Case No. 481 of 2011 by the Court of learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna whereby marriage between the parties has been dissolved by passing decree of divorce.

2. Being aggrieved by the judgment and decree in favour of respondent against the appellant for dissolution of marriage and it has been prayed to allow divorce in terms of counter claim under Section 23(A) and 25 read with 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 as claimed by the appellant.

3. Briefly stated facts of the present appeal is that marriage of Anupma Kumari (appellant/wife) and Prabhash Kumar (respondent/ husband) was solemnized on 09.07.2010 according to Hindu Rites and Customs in the town of Patna. It is claimed that after marriage the appellant/wife arrived at respondent's house but she did not find any comfort and she insisted for separate accommodation. It is alleged that behavior meted out to the respondent/husband was not cordial. Respondent/husband joined his office at Mumbai after nine days of marriage but appellant did not reciprocate the same. It is as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top