SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 812

P. B. BAJANTHRI, ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
Navin Kumar Rai @ Nabin Kumar Roy – Appellant
Versus
Sudha Rai – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant : M/s Soni Shrivastava, Ravi Bhardwaj, Gaurav Singh.
For the Respondent: M/sBimal Kumar, Adv. Birendra Kumar.

Alok Kumar Pandey, J.—The present miscellaneous appeal has been directed against the judgment dated 19.01.2018 and decree dated 25.01.2018 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Darbhanga in Matrimonial Case No. 10 of 2009 whereby the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Darbhanga passed the decree of judicial separation under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act against the divorce petition filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and directed for payment of additional maintenance allowance of Rs. 5,000/- per month over and above the maintenance allowance of Rs. 25,000/- per month already being paid by the appellant-husband to the respondent-wife.

2. Briefly stated the fact of the appellant's case is that the appellant and respondent solemnized the marriage on 06.05.2001 in Mohalla-Mishratola, Town P.S., District- Darbhanga as per Hindu rites and customs. It is further averred that after marriage both parties came to Darbhanga, residence of the appellant from where on 13.05.2001 both parties went to Chandigarh where the appellant was working as Assistant Manager, NABARD. It is further averred that respondent stayed with the appellant at Chandigarh for about th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top