Back
G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
Manokamma Mini Rice Mill – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J.—The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following reliefs:—
“(i) That the present Writ application is being filed for issuance of an appropriate Writ order/ direction(s) in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the certificate case no-672 of 2014-2015 which has been initiated against the petitioner on the basis certificate which forms part of Section -7 notice is contrary to the statuary rules of Public Demand Recovery Act, 1914(herein after referred as "P.D.R.Act, 1914" for the sake of brevity) as it is blank at many column, not properly made, signed by the District Manager as well which is evident from the notice attached in Annexure-9, 9/A to this Writ application thus amount to defective notice and defective initiation of the certificate case;
II. That the present Writ application is being filed for issuance of an appropriate Writ order/ direction(s)in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the certificate case no-672 of 2014-2015 which has been initiated against the petitioner under Section-7 of the Public demand recovery act by which it is asked to pay amount of Rs.1,67,76,990.56 /; on the ground that the process is not followed prope
Issuance of recovery notice without resolving prior objections violates procedural fairness as per the Bihar & Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
