IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
VIPUL M. PANCHOLI and Dr. ANSHUMAN, JJ.
Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 1276 of 2019
(18.10.2024)
Ashok Mahto ... Appellant
vs.
State of Bihar ... Respondent
Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 376(2)(N) read with Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 – Section 4 & 6 – Rape of a minor girl – It is the duty of the prosecution to prove that the victim was minor on the date of incident by leading cogent evidence – In the present case, it is the case of the prosecution that the victim was studying in school, no efforts made to produce any documentary evidence before the court and thereby, the prosecution failed to prove that the victim was minor – Therefore, a grave error committed by the Trial Court while convicting the appellant for commission of offences under the POCSO Act – Two independent witness, stated under Section 161 Cr PC about the false implication of the appellant in land dispute and election dispute – One other independent witness (PW-12) declared hostile – Victim and her parents have narrated different stories regarding manner of incident and the time when the victim come back to the house and disclosed about the incident of rape – Clothes of the victim as well as the appellant sent to the F.S.L. for necessary analysis but the F.S.L. report not produced – Appellant/accused is said to have been assaulted by the father and other relatives of the victim and hospitalised but no injury report produced by the prosecution – Thus, the prosecution has failed to prove the case against the appellant beyond reasonable doubt – Conviction and sentence set aside – Appeal allowed. (Paras 25 to 32)
Sakindar Yadav Vs. State of Bihar, 2023 (5) BLJ 534; Deepak Kumar Vs. State of Bihar, Cr. App. (DB) No.586 of 2023, dated 28.2.2024; Chandan Singh Vs. State of Bihar, in Cr. App. (DB) No. 1142 of 2019, dated 5.9.2023 – Referred & Relied.
Vipul M. Pancholi, J.—The present appeal has been filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as ‘Code’) challenging the judgment of conviction dated 17.08.2019 and order of sentence dated 22.08.2019 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-1st-cum-Special Judge, POCSO Act, Vaishali, Hajipur in G.R. No. 1908 of 2017, arising out of Town P.S. Case No. 304 of 2017, whereby the concerned Trial Court has convicted the present appellant for the offences punishable under Section 376(2)(N) of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as I.P.C.) and Section 4 and 6 of POCSO Act. Considering the provisions of Section 42 of POCSO Act, he has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 12 years for the offence under Section 6 of POCSO Act along with a fine of Rs. 50,000/- and, in default of payment of fine, he has been sentenced to undergo S.I. for six months. However, there is no separate order of sentence for offence under Section 4 of the POCSO Act. He has been directed to pay 95% amount of fine to the victim and 5% to Government.
2. The crux of the prosecution story is as under:—
2.1. The victim is a student of Standard-VII of Awadh Bihari School. There is a Government Middle School behind her house where a shopkeeper sells snacks. Her friend and she herself used to go there to eat during tiffin time. Sometimes, when her friend was not around, she would go there alone. Ashok Mahto (the accused) was old and her neighbor. That is why she used to go to his shop to get kachori and phulori. In the meantime, Ashok Mahto said that he wanted to talk to her about something important in private. On this, when she went to his shop where he said that he would tell her something which she should not tell anyone. After that, he made her swear and after taking her oath, he took her to a maize field and opened her pants and tried to commit wrong act with her. When she protested, he told her that she has sworn in and if she would not allow him to do wrong things, he will get her parents into trouble. Because of that, she was very scared and she started crying. After that he made her keep quiet and raped her while molesting her. Out of fear, she could not say anything at her home. During second time, he told her from beside her house to go to the same maize field that day. When she went to the maize field, he told her to let him commit rape, otherwise he would kill her. After that, he forcibly started raping her. After that, she came home but did not tell her mother or any other family members about this. After that, the accused started calling her at the interval of every three days and started giving her 20 or 30 rupees after raping her. He kept on doing this for the next two months. Then, as soon as she saw him, she used to hide somewhere. In case he would see her again, he would ask her to go with him. She never consented to this. In this way, there was a gap of a few days in between. Then, like this, for the last one week, he started to forcibly rape her by calling her every alternate day. On 06.05.2017, he took her to ruins which was situated at some distance from her house where he started raping her. On 08.05.2017, at 12:30 hours, he said her to come with him. Then she told him to wait and said that she would go after some time because she did not want to go. Then, she went to Mali Complex to commit suicide. After going there, she was thinking of ways to die. Then, her father saw her there and started asking her what she was doing there. When she did not tell him anything, he started scolding her and brought her home while scolding. Then, after being asked a lot and after being sworn in, she told her family about the incident that the accused Ashok Mahto always used to rape her. After that, her cousin brother Raushan Singh brought her to the Police Station on a bike along with her mother.
2.2. After registration of the F.I.R., the Investigating Officer started the investigation and during the course of
Victim testimony in sexual assault cases must be credible and consistent; considerable contradictions undermine prosecution's case under the POCSO Act.
The prosecution failed to establish the victim's age as a child under the POCSO Act, leading to the quashing of the conviction due to insufficient evidence and credibility issues.
The court held that discrepancies in the victim's testimony and lack of corroborating evidence created reasonable doubt, leading to the appellant's acquittal.
The conviction for sexual offences against minors can rely on circumstantial evidence and victim testimony, reinforced by medical reports, even amidst witness hostility.
School records based on parental statements given primacy over ossification tests for proving minor victim's age in POCSO cases; sole credible testimony of prosecutrix sufficient for convicting fathe....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that in cases involving minors, the credibility of the victim's testimony holds significant weight, and corroboration may not always be necessar....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.