SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 899

ASHUTOSH KUMAR, JITENDRA KUMAR
Md. Mahmood Alam – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant : Mr. Md. Ataul Haque.
For the State : Mr. Abhimanyu Sharma, APP.

Judgement Key Points

The judgment holds the following regarding child victims' rights and child-friendly procedures:

  • Child victims have a right to a child-friendly procedure throughout investigation and trial, including recording of statements by a sensitive woman police officer in the presence of parents/guardian or trusted person, preferably at the child's residence or shelter home, avoiding police station premises. (!) (!) (!)

  • Section 24 POCSO mandates recording child's statement in a child-friendly manner, using simple, non-leading questions, with audio-video electronic means where feasible, to minimize trauma. (!) (!) (!)

  • Trial courts must adopt child-friendly trial practices: permitting child to testify via video-conferencing or behind one-way mirror/screen to prevent confrontation with accused; avoiding aggressive cross-examination; presence of support persons; and ensuring no disclosure of child's identity. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)

  • Child victims' right to privacy and dignity is paramount; courts must prohibit publication of material identifying the child, and expunge such details from records. (!) (!)

  • Right to free legal aid and support services for child victims from the inception of proceedings, including psychological assistance if needed. (!) (!)

  • Delays in trial for child victims must be minimized; adjournments granted sparingly, prioritizing expeditious disposal under Section 35 POCSO. (!) (!)


Jitendra Kumar, J.—The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 25.03.2022 and 29.03.2022 respectively passed by learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-VII,-cum-Exclusive Special Court (POCSO) Act, Sasaram, Rohtas in POCSO Case No. 25 of 2015, arising out of Tilauthu P.S. Case No. 385 of 2014, whereby the sole Appellant has been found guilty of offence punishable under Section 376 I.P.C. and Section 5/6 of the POCSO Act, 2012. However, the appellant has not been sentenced under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and instead he has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for the remainder of natural life and to pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- under Section 6 of the POCSO Act and in case of default to pay the fine, to further undergo additional simple imprisonment for one year. The victim has been also awarded compensation of Rs.4,00,000/- towards her rehabilitation to be paid by DLSA Rohtas at Sasaram.

Prosecution case.

2. The prosecution case as emerging from the written report of the informant given to the Officer-in-Charge of Tilauthu Police Station on 6.5.2014 is that on 04.05.2014, his 10 year old niece was taken b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top