SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 883

ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL
Virendra Das @ Virendra Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Sarita Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: M/s Subodh Kr Jha, Sarveshwar Tiwary.
For the Respondents: Mr Brij Nandad Prasad.

Arvind Singh Chandel, J.—With the consent of both the parties, heard finally.

2. This revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner being aggrieved with the judgment dated 24.08.2023 whereby and where under the learned Family Court, while deciding the application under Section 125 of the Cr P C filed by the opposite party – wife, directed the petitioner to pay a monthly maintenance amount of Rs 20,000/- to the opposite party – wife, and his minor son from the date of submission of application, i.e., 27.02.2019.

3. Undisputedly, opposite party No 1 is the legally wedded wife of the petitioner. Their marriage was solemnized in the year, 1986 and from the admission made by the petitioner himself, it is also apparent that as of now, without getting any divorce from the opposite party – wife, he performed his second marriage in the year, 1992.

4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in the year, 1989, a girl child was born out of their wedlock and immediately thereafter, the opposite party – wife left the child with the petitioner and went to her Maike and did not return. Thus, it is clear that the opposite party – wife herself left the house of the petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top