PRAKASH CHANDRA GUPTA
Madhulika Bhate W/o Santosh Kumar Bhate – Appellant
Versus
Santosh Kumar S/O Ganpatraoji Bhate – Respondent
ORDER :
This revision petition u/S 19(4) of the Family Courts Act r/w section 397 o f Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner/wife being aggrieved by the order dated 15/10/2019 passed by Ist Additional Principal Judge, Family Court Indore in MJC no.78/2015, whereby the learned trial court has partly allowed an application u/S 125 of Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner/wife and awarded her Rs.5,000/- per month maintenance against the respondent/husband from the date of impugned order. Hence, the present petition lies before this court for enhancement of maintenance amount.
2. It was admitted fact before the trial court that marriage between the petitioner and respondent was solemnized on 24/12/1978. From the wedlock of the parties, three children named Prajakta Bhaate, Pallavi Bhaate and Vedanshu alias Sameer Bhaate were born on 03/11/1981, 24/01/1984 and 03/08/1994 respectively. It was also admitted fact that the respondent is a retired bank manager and he gets pension of a sum of Rs.25,321/- per month and the petitioner is living separately from the respondent since year 1999. It was also undisputed fact that Prajakta Bhaate and Pallavi Bhaate are married and Vendanshu is a major.
3. Fa
Shanti Devi Vs. Uttam Prakash [1981 DMC 22; equivalent citation- (1980) 17 DLT 63 (1)]
Bakula Bai Vs. Ganga Ram [(1988) 1 SCC 537]
Dr. Kulbhushan Kumar Vs. Raj Kumari And Ors. [(1970) 3 SCC 129]
The court upheld the trial court's maintenance award, emphasizing the need for maintenance to reflect the husband's financial capacity and the wife's inability to support herself.
Maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C should be awarded from the date of the application, and evidence is essential to substantiate income claims.
The enhancement of maintenance must ensure a spouse can sustain a dignified lifestyle, reflecting their status in marriage.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to enhance the maintenance amount under Section 125 Cr.P.C. based on the income of the respondent-husband and the needs of th....
The court upheld the enhancement of maintenance due to increased salary and living costs, affirming the obligation to support dependents at a standard of living commensurate with the petitioner's sta....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.