Back
SATYAVRAT VERMA
Girija Prajapati – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Satyavrat Verma, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Tilka Manjhi University, Bhagalpur and the learned AC to GA-11.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant writ application has been filed seeking quashing of the order dated 07.04.2012 (Annexure-1) passed by the Vice Chancellor of the University whereby representation dated 23.12.2010 filed by the petitioner in compliance of the order dated 28.09.2010 in CWJC No. 4450 of 2005, seeking restoration of his salary in the pay scale of Rs. 2280 to 4000/- as fixed on 01.01.1986 and thereafter to fix the consequential pay scale with effect from 01.01.1996 onward and to release the difference of salary till 31.05.2011 has been rejected.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was appointed as Typist-cum-Librarian in DSM College, Jhajha, an affiliated college of the University, in the pay scale of Rs. 220-315 on 23.03.1976, the college became a constituent college of the University on 19.04.1982. It is next submitted that petitioner passed his B.A. examination in 3rd Division in the year 1977, thereafter passed his M.A. examination in the year
Legal entitlement to pay scales depends on prescribed qualifications, emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles in administrative decisions.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the petitioner to the pay scale of Rs. 2200-4000/- from the date of her appointment, the benefit of the Sixth Pay Commission,....
The Pay Verification Cell lacks authority to unilaterally modify pay scales set by statutory committees, affirming the jurisdiction of University committees in pay fixation.
Appointment of the petitioner and the re-designation are concerned, both the issues have been given a quietus by this Court. It is not that the State Government was not aware about the appointment so....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the illegality of reducing the petitioner's pay-scale without adhering to principles of natural justice, and the emphasis on equal treatment of emp....
The court emphasized the principle of equal pay for equal work, ruling that the petitioners were entitled to the same pay scale as their counterparts in other universities due to administrative error....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
