SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 882

ANSHUMAN
Nawal Kishore Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Mostt. Raj Kumari Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants : M/s J.K. Verma, Suraj Narain Yadav.
For the Respondents: Mr. Naresh Ch. Verma.

Dr. Anshuman, J.—The present second appeal has been filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 30.05.1988 and 17.06.1988 respectively, passed by Sri S.N. Pathak, 1st Additional District Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur, in Title Appeal No.28 of 1987 affirming the Judgment and Decree dated 02.05.1987 and 15.05.1987 respectively, passed by Sri S.N. Sukla, Sub-Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur, in Title Suit No.48 of 1983. The Defendant No.1 of Title Suit No.48 of 1983 was the appellant of Title Appeal No.28 of 1987 and he is also the appellant in Second Appeal No.583 of 1988. The plaintiff of Title Suit No.48 of 1983 is respondent First Party of Title Appeal No. 28 of 1987 and his heirs and legal representatives 1.1 to 1.7 are the respondent first set in this appeal. Defendant No.2 Shambhu Choudhary of Title Suit No.48 of 1983 is respondent Second Party of Title Appeal No.28 of 1987 and his heirs and legal representatives from 2.1 to 2.3 are the respondent second set in the present Second Appeal No.583 of 1988.

2. It is a second appeal against the Judgment of affirmance. The Title Suit No.48 of 1983 was filed for grant of relief of specific performance of a contract for sale (Mahadanama) dated 15

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top