Back
JASPREET SINGH
Bimla Devi – Appellant
Versus
Mangla Devi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. questions on legality of lower court's proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background of property dispute and sale agreement. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. the trial court's handling of the property dispute. (Para 11 , 12 , 15 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. arguments regarding plaintiffs' readiness and willingness. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 24 , 25) |
| 5. defendants’ response and counterarguments to plaintiffs' claims. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 6. court's duty to comply with order 41 rule 31 cpc. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 36) |
| 7. definition and importance of readiness and willingness. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 8. conclusion on plaintiffs' lack of readiness and entitlement. (Para 50 , 51) |
| 9. final judgment and order of the court. (Para 52 , 53) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The instant appeal has been preferred by the defendants/appellants against the judgment and decree passed by the Lower Appellate Court dated 20th January, 1982 passed in Civil Appeal No. 338 of 1980, as a result, a suit for specific performance of contract bearing R.S. No. 133 of 1973 which was dismissed by the Trial Court has been decreed by the Lower Appellate Court.
2. The aforesaid second appeal was admitted by means of order dated 26.05.1982 b
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
