SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 855

PURNENDU SINGH
Jitendra Kumar Jitu – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Prashant Kumar.
For the Respondents: Mr. Shailendra Kumar Dwivedi.

Purnendu Singh, J.—Heard Mr. Prashant Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Shailendra Kumar Dwivedi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner in paragraph no. 1 of the present writ petition has sought inter alia, following relief(s) which is reproduced hereinafter:—

“For issuance of appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereby quashing and setting aside the Memo No. 174 dated 09.02.2023 issued by the Additional Collector (District Establishment), Begusarai rejecting the application of the Petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground for the reason that the application was made after seven (7) years of death of the Petitioner’s father.

(ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby directing the Respondents to consider the appointment of the Petitioner on compassionate grounds pursuant to the order dated 12.03.2021 passed by this Hon’ble Court in CWJC No. 7380/2020.

(iii) For grant of such other order or direction for which the Petitioner is found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top