SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 896

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
ASHUTOSH KUMAR and JITENDRA KUMAR, JJ.
Criminal Appeal (DB) Nos. 1318 with 1266, 1323 and 1447 of 2019
(30.10.2024)
Munaki Rai (in 1318)
Ajay Rai (in 1266)
Shiv Chandra Rai (in 1323)
Vijay Rai (in 1447) ... Appellants
vs.
State of Bihar ... Respondent
(in all)

Advocates:
For the Appellants : M/s Archana Sinha, Nishikant, Alok Kumar @ Alok Kr Shahi (in all).
For the State : Mr. Binod Bihari Singh, APP (in all).
For the Informant : Mr. Dilip Kumar Singh (in all).

Headnote:

Criminal Trial – Appreciation of evidence – It is a settled position of law that the prosecution case cannot be thrown out or doubted on the sole ground that the independent witnesses were not examined because as per experience, civilized people are generally insensitive when a crime is committed in their presence – The court is therefore required to appreciate the evidence of even related witnesses on its own merit, instead of doubting the prosecution case for want of independent witnesses – It is also a settled position of law that the evidence of any relative or family numbers cannot be discarded only on account of his or her relationship with the deceased – The evidence of such witnesses has to be weighed on the touchstone of truth and at most the court is required to take care and caution while appreciating their evidence – This is also a settled position of law that minor discrepancies, contradictions, improvements, embellishments or omissions on trivial matters not going to the root of the prosecution case should not be given undue importance – but if they relate to material particulars of the prosecution case, the testimony of such witnesses is liable to be discarded – It is also settled position of law that in case of FIR being preceded by inquest report, the veracity/authenticity of the prosecution case is not automatically lost – It has to be tested by appreciating the attending circumstances – it is also a settled position of law that enmity is a doubled-aged weapon – existence of motive on the part of an accused may be held to be the reason for committing crime, the same may also lead to false implication – It is also a settled position of law that motive plays an important link to complete the chain of circumstances in a case of circumstantial evidence – but in case at direct evidence, motive has no much importance. (Paras 19 to 24)

Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 302/34, 341/34 & 452/149 and Arms Act, 1959 – Section 27 – Appellant Vijay Rai and Munaki firing at the father and nephew of the informant resulting in their death – No substantial delay in recording the fardbeyan and lodging of the formal FIR – The sequence of events does not create any doubt for concoction and embellishment in the prosecution case – A gap of about three days between the lodging the FIR and endorsement of the learned Jurisdictional Magistrate on the FIR may be on account of the official reasons and in absence of any cross-examination of the I.O. on this score, there is no reason to doubt the veracity/authenticity of the prosecution case – no material contradictions in the statement of witnesses – Medical evidence proves the gunshot injuries – Actus rea by the appellants Vijay Rai and Munaki Rai committed with the mens rea – hence the Appeal Nos. 1318/19 & 1447/19 dismissed – Other appeals allowed. (Paras 44 to 55)

Appabhai Vs. State of Gujarat, 1988 Supp SCC 241; Abhishek Sharma Vs. State (NCT of Delhi), 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1358; Yogesh Singh Vs. Mahabeer Singh, (2017) 11 SCC 195; Ramesh Baburao Devaskar Vs. State of Maharashtra, (2007) 13 SCC 501; Sambhu Das Vs. State of Assam, (2010) 10 SCC 374; Shivaji Chintappa Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra, 2021 (2) BLJ 419 (SC) : (2021) 5 SCC 626 – Relied.

Jitendra Kumar, J.—All the appeals have been taken up together as they have been preferred against the same impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 03.09.2019 and 04.09.2019 respectively, passed by learned 2ndAdditional District and Sessions Judge-, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connetion with Sessions Trial No. 10 of 2018 + 452 of 2017, CNR No. BRVA010017112017 arising out of Jurawanpur P.S. Case No. 34 of 2017, whereby all six appellants have been found guilty under Sections 302/34, 341/34 and 452/149 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- each under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. All the appellants have been further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for four years under Section 452/149 of the Indian Penal Code. They have been further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month under Section 341/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In addition to the aforesaid sentences, all the appellants have been further awarded four years rigorous imprisonment under Section 27 of the Arms Act. It was further directed that in case of default to pay the fine of Rs. 50,000/- by the appellants each, all the appellants would be required to undergo an additional rigorous imprisonment for six months. All the sentences have been directed to run concurrently. By the order of sentence, ninety percent of the fine has also been directed to be paid to the successors of the deceased persons in equal proportion as compensation.

Prosecution case

2. The prosecution case as emerging from the fardbeyan of the informant/Santosh Rai as recorded by A.S.I. Sushil Paswan of Jurawanpur Police Station on 19.06.2017 at 13:05 O’ clock at the door of Santosh Rai is that when the informant was digging out soil from his agricultural field situated to the south and east, the appellant/Shiv Chandra Rai came with farsa in his hand and with intent to kill him, he assaulted him with farsa whereupon he fled away leaving the soil and soon thereafter, at 08:30 O’ clock, he gave information to the Police Station and came to his village. When the informant was with his family members at about 12:30 O’ clock, the appellants, viz., Munaki Rai, Vijay Rai, Ajay Rai, Shiv Chandra Rai, Subodh Rai and Uma Shankar Rai, all of whom were carrying country made pistols and Dasa Rai came at his home. The accused Dasa Rai exhorted the appellants to shoot the family of the informant dead. Whereupon, the appellant/Vijay Rai fired at his father Bhagwat Rai causing injury on the right side of his chest. Consequently, his father fell on the place of occurrence after getting injured. Later on, he died on the place of occurrence itself. In the meantime, the nephew of the informant, namely, Mithilesh Rai came out from his home, whereupon, Munaki Rai, who was carrying country made pistol, fired at him, causing injury in his stomach. Appellant/Shiv Chandra Rai also fired at his nephew. In the meantime, Subodh Rai, Uma Shankar Rai, Ajay Rai also fired by their country made pistol at his brother Anil Rai causing injury in his left hand. Seeing the firing, the informant fled away raising his voice to save his life and informed the police. All the accused persons fled away directing the informant to leave the village failing which his whole family was threatened to be finished. This occurrence had taken place on account of land dispute. His nephew died en-route to hospital for treatment.

Factual Background

3. On the basis of the fardbeyan of the informant, Jurawanpur P.S. Case No. 34 of 2017 was registered on 19.06.2017 against seven named accused persons including the appellants herein for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 302, 504, 506, and 452 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

4. After investigation, first charge-sheet bearing no. 43 of 2017 dated 19.06.2017 was submitted against five accused persons, who ar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top