SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Pat) 144

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, Sourendra Pandey, JJ.
The State of Bihar - Petitioner
Versus
Aman Singh S/O Ajay Singh - Respondent
Death Reference No.2 of 2024, Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 691 of 2024
Decided On : 22-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Anil singh, Amicus Curiae Mr. Manoj Kumar No.1, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Xxxxx
For the Informant :Mr. Ansul, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Advocate, Mr. Eashiita Raj, Advocate, Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Sada Nan Roy, Advocate

The court affirmed the death penalty for the murder conviction, citing the heinous nature of the crime and insufficient mitigating factors, reinforcing the gravity of the offense relative to the societal context.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Section 302/34 - Death reference and criminal appeal - Appellants convicted of murder and sentenced to death for brutally killing three individuals over a land dispute - Evidence showed intent and motive beyond reasonable doubt, corroborated by eyewitness testimonies and medical reports detailing severe injuries. (Paras 1, 12, 48, 66-70)

(B) Standard of Evidence - Prosecution must prove case beyond reasonable doubt, and discrepancies in witness testimonies scrutinized - Defence failed to establish doubt regarding the credibility of eyewitnesses or the occurrence itself. (Paras 9, 23, 57, 64)

(C) Sentencing - Aggravating circumstances outweighed any mitigating factors, deeming the crime rarest of the rare - Capital punishment deemed necessary for justice and to ensure societal security. (Paras 66-71)

Facts of the case:
The appellants, due to a land dispute, attacked the deceased with swords leading to their death, with witnesses corroborating the incident and medical evidence supporting the cause of death.

Findings of Court:
The prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt; no significant doubts were raised regarding the testimonies provided.

Issues: The primary issues were the validity of the FIR, the credibility of eyewitnesses, and the justification for the death sentence.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that the brutal nature of the murders and the circumstances surrounding the case warranted the death penalty, as the crime had left the victims' families with irreversible trauma and loss.

Result: Death sentences confirmed, appeals dismissed.

Table of Content
1. factual background surrounding the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. details regarding the investigation and initial proceedings. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. arguments pertaining to the delay in fir and its implications. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
4. discussion on the sufficiency of evidentiary support for prosecution. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
5. analysis of medical evidence and its correlation with eyewitness testimonies. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
6. consideration of prosecution’s procedural shortcomings. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
7. counterarguments from the informant's counsel. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40)
8. court’s observations on witness credibility. (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52)
9. evaluation of the appropriateness of sentencing. (Para 66 , 68 , 70)
10. affirmation of conviction and sentence. (Para 72 , 73 , 74)

JUDGMENT :

RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD, J.

The death reference registered under Section 366 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short ‘CrPC’) and the Criminal Appeal preferred by the two appellants are arising out of the judgment of conviction dated 2nd May, 2024 (hereinafter referred to as the 'impugned judgment') and the order of sentence dated 9th May, 2024 (hereinafter referred to as the 'impugned order') passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-19, Rohtas at Sasaram (hereinafter referred to as 'the learned trial court') in Sessions Trial No. 10 of 2022 arising out of Darihat P.S. Case No. 111 of 2021 dated 13th July, 2021 registered under Section 302 /34 of the Indian Penal Code (in short ‘IPC’).

By the impugned judgment and order, the appellants have been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 302 /34 IPC and have been sentenced to death.

2. The appellants Aman Singh and Sonal Singh in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 691 of 2024 have prayed for setting aside the impugned judgment and order of the learned trial court. The prosecution case is based on the fardbeyan of Shakuntala Devi, wife of Late Vijay Singh, Resident of Village Khudrao, P.S.-Darihat, District-Rohtas recorded by ASI Bimlesh Kumar on 13th July, 2021 at 23:00 Hrs. near postmortem house, Sadar Hospital, Sasaram. In her fardbeyan (Exhibit ‘3’), the informant, who is wife of one of the deceased and has been examined as PW-4 in course of trial, has stated as under:-

On 13.07.2021 at 18:00 Hours, when her husband Vijay Singh and her son Deepak Singh were at home then, her Pattidars, namely, (1) Ajay Singh, (2) Sonal Singh and (3) Aman Singh started ploughing the disputed land adjacent to the house. When her husband and her son went to stop them, then they started abusing them and assaulted them with fist and lathi. Somehow, her husband and her son fled away from there to Rang Bahadur Singh’s door. After some time, the accused persons while chasing came to Rang Bahadur Singh’s door and they abused her husband and her son and also started assaulting them with lathi/danda. In the meanwhile, her younger son Rakesh Singh also came there from Dehri and on seeing his father and brother getting assaulted, after pacifying the fight he took his father and brother to his old house towards kitta. Then the above three accused persons armed with sword while chasing them reached purana kitta and started hitting her husband and sons with sword. Sonal Singh with an intention to kill, hit her elder son Deepak Singh as a result of which he got cut on his neck, face, cheek, head and chest and blood started oozing out and he became unconscious. Aman Singh attacked her younger son Rakesh Singh with sword in his hand with an intention to kill him, Rakesh got cuts on both his hands, face, neck and head and fell unconscious. When her husband on seeing his children getting injured went to save them then Ajay Singh hit him with sword on his neck as a result of which he got a serious injury on his neck, he started bleeding profusely and he fell unconscious. Meanwhile, Gayatri Devi wife of Ajay Singh came with a spear in her hand and gave it to her hus

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top