IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, Sourendra Pandey, JJ.
The State of Bihar - Petitioner
Versus
Aman Singh S/O Ajay Singh - Respondent
Death Reference No.2 of 2024, Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 691 of 2024
Decided On : 22-01-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background surrounding the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details regarding the investigation and initial proceedings. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments pertaining to the delay in fir and its implications. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. discussion on the sufficiency of evidentiary support for prosecution. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 5. analysis of medical evidence and its correlation with eyewitness testimonies. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. consideration of prosecution’s procedural shortcomings. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 7. counterarguments from the informant's counsel. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 8. court’s observations on witness credibility. (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 9. evaluation of the appropriateness of sentencing. (Para 66 , 68 , 70) |
| 10. affirmation of conviction and sentence. (Para 72 , 73 , 74) |
JUDGMENT :
RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD, J.
The death reference registered under Section 366 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short ‘CrPC’) and the Criminal Appeal preferred by the two appellants are arising out of the judgment of conviction dated 2nd May, 2024 (hereinafter referred to as the 'impugned judgment') and the order of sentence dated 9th May, 2024 (hereinafter referred to as the 'impugned order') passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-19, Rohtas at Sasaram (hereinafter referred to as 'the learned trial court') in Sessions Trial No. 10 of 2022 arising out of Darihat P.S. Case No. 111 of 2021 dated 13th July, 2021 registered under Section 302 /34 of the Indian Penal Code (in short ‘IPC’).
By the impugned judgment and order, the appellants have been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 302 /34 IPC and have been sentenced to death.
2. The appellants Aman Singh and Sonal Singh in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 691 of 2024 have prayed for setting aside the impugned judgment and order of the learned trial court. The prosecution case is based on the fardbeyan of Shakuntala Devi, wife of Late Vijay Singh, Resident of Village Khudrao, P.S.-Darihat, District-Rohtas recorded by ASI Bimlesh Kumar on 13th July, 2021 at 23:00 Hrs. near postmortem house, Sadar Hospital, Sasaram. In her fardbeyan (Exhibit ‘3’), the informant, who is wife of one of the deceased and has been examined as PW-4 in course of trial, has stated as under:-
On 13.07.2021 at 18:00 Hours, when her husband Vijay Singh and her son Deepak Singh were at home then, her Pattidars, namely, (1) Ajay Singh, (2) Sonal Singh and (3) Aman Singh started ploughing the disputed land adjacent to the house. When her husband and her son went to stop them, then they started abusing them and assaulted them with fist and lathi. Somehow, her husband and her son fled away from there to Rang Bahadur Singh’s door. After some time, the accused persons while chasing came to Rang Bahadur Singh’s door and they abused her husband and her son and also started assaulting them with lathi/danda. In the meanwhile, her younger son Rakesh Singh also came there from Dehri and on seeing his father and brother getting assaulted, after pacifying the fight he took his father and brother to his old house towards kitta. Then the above three accused persons armed with sword while chasing them reached purana kitta and started hitting her husband and sons with sword. Sonal Singh with an intention to kill, hit her elder son Deepak Singh as a result of which he got cut on his neck, face, cheek, head and chest and blood started oozing out and he became unconscious. Aman Singh attacked her younger son Rakesh Singh with sword in his hand with an intention to kill him, Rakesh got cuts on both his hands, face, neck and head and fell unconscious. When her husband on seeing his children getting injured went to save them then Ajay Singh hit him with sword on his neck as a result of which he got a serious injury on his neck, he started bleeding profusely and he fell unconscious. Meanwhile, Gayatri Devi wife of Ajay Singh came with a spear in her hand and gave it to her hus
Machhi Singh vs. State of Punjab
Bachan Singh vs. State of Punjab
Allarakha Habib Memon vs. State of Gujarat
State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Ratan Singh
Pulen Phukan & Ors. vs. State of Assam
Sunil Kundu and Anr. vs. State of Jharkhand
The court affirmed the death penalty for the murder conviction, citing the heinous nature of the crime and insufficient mitigating factors, reinforcing the gravity of the offense relative to the soci....
The prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt; inconsistencies and lack of independent witnesses can lead to quashing of conviction.
Eyewitness testimony must be consistent and corroborated; convictions cannot rely solely on the testimony of closely related witnesses without independent verification.
Delay in FIR and pre-FIR inquest not vitiating trial absent prejudice; reliable natural witness testimony, corroborated by medical/weapon evidence, suffices for murder conviction despite inconclusive....
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; inconsistent eyewitness accounts can lead to acquittal.
Key legal principles established include the standards of eyewitness reliability and the requirements for proving possession of intent in conspiracy cases, emphasizing that absence of evidence negate....
Conviction for murder by unlawful assembly sustainable on reliable sole eyewitness to killing, corroborated by medical evidence and abduction witnesses, despite FIR delay, witness non-examination, an....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.