SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 930

A. ABHISHEK REDDY
Chandrika Sah – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr.Vikash Kumar Pankaj.
For the Respondents: Mr. Arvind Ujjwal (SC-4).

ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief(s):—

“To issue Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ order to set aside the order dated 12.06.2023 contained in Memo No. 3694 dated 19.06.2023 (Annexure-8) whereby Respondent No. 2 has rejected the PDS Appeal No. 62/2019 filed by the Petitioner assailing the order contained in Memo No. 610 dt. 28.08.2019 (Annexure-6) whereby Respondent No. 4 has cancelled the PDS fair price Shop License No. 96/2016 issued to the Petitioner.

(ii) To issue Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ order to set aside the order contained in Memo No. 610 dated 28.08.2019 (Annexure-6) whereby Respondent No. 4 has cancelled the PDS fair price Shop License No. 96/2016 issued to the Petitioner.

(iii) To issue Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ order to set aside the illegal, perverse & cryptic show cause notice dated 12.07.2019 (Annexure-1) issued to the Petitioner by the Respondent No. 4 as the same is not in accordance with Rule 27 (ii) of the Bihar Targeted P.D.S. (Control) Order, 2016 (Hereinafter, referred as, "the Control Order").

(iv) To issue Writ of Certiorari

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top