SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 1152

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
VIPUL M. PANCHOLI and Dr. ANSHUMAN, JJ.
Criminal Appeal (DB) Nos. 860 with 866 of 2018
(12.12.2024)
Amar Yadav (in 860)
Daso Yadav and Anr. (in 866) ... Appellants
vs.
State of Bihar ... Respondent
(in both)

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : M/s Rajesh Kumar Singh, Sr. Adv., Shekhar Kumar Singh, Buddhilal Yadav, Rupesh Kumar Singh, Amit Kumar Singh(in both)
For the State : Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh, APP (in both).
For the Informant : M/s Lakshmi Kant Tiwary, Nitesh Kumar (in both).

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 302/34 [Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 – Sections 103(1)/3(5)] – Arms Act, 1959 – Section 27 – Murder – Common intention – Life sentence – There are major contradictions and discrepancies in deposition of so-called eye-witnesses – Delay in lodging FIR would be fatal to prosecution – Trial Court has not believed allegation of prosecution with regard to conspiracy hatched by accused and trial court has acquitted six accused against which nobody has filed acquittal appeal – Though confessional statement of accused were recorded by Investigating Officer, there is no recovery or discovery of alleged weapons/firearms from any of appellants or even from other accused – There is nothing on record to suggest that Investigating Officer had, in fact, seized blood from place of occurrence – Medical evidence does not support version given by so-called eye-witnesses – Prosecution has failed to prove case against appellants beyond reasonable doubt – Appellants acquitted of charges levelled against them – Appeals allowed. (Paras 20, 21, 22, 25, 26 and 27)

Vipul M. Pancholi, J.—Both the appeals are filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’) against the judgment of conviction dated 24.05.2018 and order of sentence dated 25.05.2018, passed by the court of F.T.C.-1st., Khagaria in Sessions Case No.170 of 2015, Trial No.409/2017, arising out of Alauli P.S. Case No.103 of 2015, G.R. No.1182 of 2015, whereby the court has convicted the appellants for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code as well as under Section 27 of the Arms Act and they have been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand only) each for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and in default of payment of fine, the appellants have to undergo S.I. for a period of one year. The appellants are further sentenced to undergo R.I. for five years for the offence punishable under Section 27 of the Arms Act. Both the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.

2. The factual matrix of the present case is as under:—

2.1. Fardbeyan of Pramod Ram came to be recorded on 07.05.2015 at 13:00 hours at village Larhi wherein the informant has stated that on 07.05.2015 at about 08:30 in the morning, he was sitting near the Communist Party branch office in his village Lahri. His mother Bhago Devi was also sitting next to him. Just then, six persons, namely, Daso Yadav, Rajo Yadav, Amar Yadav, Lalo Yadav, Raban Yadav and Suresh Yadav came from the north on two motorcycles. Getting down from the motorcycle, Daso Yadav and Rajo Yadav asked his mother, "Netaji how are you?" Suddenly all six accused persons took out their weapons and started firing indiscriminately. All the accused fired several bullets on his mother's head and body. His mother fell down there and died. When he ran to save his life, two bullets were fired at him too but he escaped. After killing his mother, all the accused fled on their motorcycles towards north. While running away, about ten bullets were fired by the accused. He is sure that murder of his mother has been conspired by all the above accused besides Jai Jairam Yadav, Sandeep Yadav and Subhash Yadav alias Lambu. The reason for murder of his mother is that his mother was the informant and eyewitness of Alauli P.S. Case No. 220/13 in which Sukhdev Ram, a leader of C.P.I., Alauli was murdered. The above-mentioned accused were also involved in this case. His mother was murdered with the aim of destroying evidence. Apart from him, his son Rajesh Kumar and Bhuneshwar Ram son of late Gali Ram and his sister Kari Devi, wife of Bhuneshwar Ram, have also witnessed this incident.

2.2. After registration of the formal FIR on the basis of the aforesaid fardbeyan, the Investigating Agency started investigation. During course of investigation, the Investigating Officer recorded the statement of the witnesses, collected the documentary evidence and thereafter filed charge-sheet against the appellants.

2.3. As the case was exclusively triable by court of sessions, the learned Magistrate committed the same under Section 209 of the Code to the concerned sessions court where the same was registered as Sessions Case No.170/2015.

2.4. During course of trial, the prosecution has examined 8 witnesses, namely, PW-1, Pramod Ram, PW-2, Bhubaneshwar Ram, PW-3, Karo Devi, PW-4, Ashok Ram, PW-5, Suresh Sada, PW-6, Mukesh Kumar, PW-7, Umashankar Rajak and PW-8, Dr. Md. Gulsanobar. Thereafter further statement of the accused under Section 313 of the Code came to be recorded. After conclusion of the trial, the Trial Court convicted the appellants, as stated hereinabove.

3. Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Shekhar Kumar Singh for the appellants, Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State as well as Mr. Lakshmi Kant Tiwary, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

4. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top