SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 24

ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL
Kamlesh Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr Prabhakar Sahai.
For the Respondents: Mr H. S. Goldie, AC to GP-VI.

Arvind Singh Chandel, J.—The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order (Annexure P3) dated 04.08.2023 issued by the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Nalanda whereby and whereunder the money worth Rs 2,17,738/- has been adjusted from the retiral benefits of the petitioner.

2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed as Clerk on compassionate ground in the office of the District Superintendent of Education, Nalanda on 28.12.1990. After completion of stipulated period, he received the benefit of first, second and third MACP in the year 2002, 2014 and 2021 respectively. He retired from the post of Clerk on 30.06.2023 from the office of the District Education Officer, Nalanda and, accordingly, his pension was verified from the office of the Accountant General (A & E), Bihar, Patna. Thereafter, the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Nalanda issued Letter No 2879 dated 04.08.2023 (Annexure P3) and instructed the Treasury Officer, Nalanda to adjust the amount of Rs 2,17,738/- from the retiral dues of the petitioner as it was given due to wrong pay fixation in favour of the petitioner. Hence, this petition has been filed.

3. The learned coun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top