SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 22

ARUN KUMAR JHA
Ashutosh Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kaushalya Devi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: M/s Arun
Kumar, Raghubir Chaudhary.
For the Respondent: None.

Arun Kumar Jha, J.—Present learned counsel for the petitioners however, no one appears on behalf of the respondents despite service of notice upon the respondents.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and I intend to dispose of the present petition at the stage of admission itself.

3. The instant petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioners for quashing the order dated 04.03.2017 passed in Title Appeal No. 26 of 2009 by learned Additional District Judge-II, Samastipur whereby and wherein the learned Additional District Judge rejected the petition filed by the petitioners under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short “the Code”).

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the appellants are respondents before this Court and they filed Title Suit No. 59 of 1996 for declaration of their Title over the suit property which include part of lands bearing Tauzi No. 3968, Khata No. 334(old)/1179(new), Khesra No. 5497 part old/new 8748 measuring 12 kathas 2 dhurs 15 dhurki and also part of land bearing khata no. 1, khesra no. 5379(old)/8803(new) measuring 9 katha 3 dhurs, both situated in Village Kalyanpur Bambaiya, P.S. - Bibhutipur, District Samastipur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top