SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 1132

KHATIM REZA
Md. Ali – Appellant
Versus
Chief Executive Officer, Bihar State Sunni Waqf Board, Haj Bhawan – Respondent


ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the opposite parties.

2. All these three Revisions Applications arise out of Eviction Applications which were allowed by the learned Chairman/Presiding Officer, the Bihar State Waqf Tribunal Patna, (for brevity ‘the Tribunal’) whereby petitioners have been declared as encroachers of the properties of Haji Khuda, Baksh Waqf Estate No. 1190.

3. Civil Revision Nos. 73 of 2019 has been filed by the petitioner against the order dated 02.04.2019 passed in Eviction Application No. 06 of 2016 whereby petitioner has been declared as encroachers of the properties of Haji Khuda Baksh, Waqf Estate No. 1190 over plot No. 2699.

4. So far Civil Revision Nos. 92 of 2019, 94 of 2019, 98 of 2019, 99 of 2019 and 100 of 2019 are concerned, they have been filed by different petitioners against the common order dated 05-04-2019 passed in Eviction Application No. 05 of 2017 whereby petitioners have been declared as encroachers of the properties of Haji Khuda Baksh, Waqf Estate No. 1190. Details of the encroached portion of the Waqf Estate has been given at the foot of the Eviction Application.

5. The case of the applicant/ Bihar State Sun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top