IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
Mehvish Adil – Petitioner
Versus
Delhi Wakf Board & Ors. - Respondents
C.R.P. 223-225 of 2019 & CM APPLs. 44663, 44665, 44666 44668, 44669 & 44671 of 2019
Decided On : 15-12-2021
Waqf Act, 1995 - Section 54- Section 55 - Sections 6 & 7- Section 107- Waqf property- constitution of the Waqf Board- Seeking injunction against the Waqf Board from dispossessing the Petitioners, from property – Encroachment of wakf property – Eviction - limitation and the power of the Waqf Tribunal for eviction.
Finding of the Court : Occupants would be removed from the suit property by rejection of an application for injunction under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC, filed by the Petitioners themselves against the Waqf Board- The Waqf Tribunal which is the competent forum to adjudicate as to whether the land belongs to the Waqf or not, has entertained the suit – ‘Due process’ need not always mean a process initiated by the owner it can be any judicial proceedings where the respective contentions of the parties are adjudicated in a free and fair manner and with proper opportunity being afforded to the parties.
Result : Petition dismissed
JUDGMENT :
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
1. The Waqf Act, 1995 (hereinafter “Waqf Act”) is a special enactment which is meant to provide for the better administration of Waqfs, including the property which vests in Waqfs. The Waqf Act has been enacted for the larger public good to ensure that Waqfs and Waqf-related properties are properly managed and the income derived from the Waqf property is utilized for the larger good of the community.
2. A perusal of the scheme of the Waqf Act shows that this statute contemplates the creation of Waqf Boards which, in Delhi, is the Delhi Wakf Board/Respondent No.1 (hereinafter “Waqf Board”). The Waqf Board conducts surveys as per the Waqf Act. Disputes relating to Waqf properties are resolved by the Waqf Tribunal under Sections 6 & 7 of the Waqf Act. The constitution of the Waqf Board is provided for in Chapter IV of the Waqf Act, including the duties and functions of the Waqf Board. One such duty of the Waqf Board is to ensure removal of encroachments from Waqf properties under Section 54 of the Waqf Act. Section 55 of the Waqf Act further provides that the Executive Magistrate shall take action for the enforcement of such orders made under Section 54, in case the occupant against whom eviction orders are issued by the Waqf Board, fails to remove such encroachment.
Facts
3. The present revision petitions arise out of orders dated 4th October, 2019 passed by the Waqf Tribunal/NDD/PHC (hereinafter “Waqf Tribunal”) in ML No.27/2018 titled Mehvish Adil v. Delhi Wakf Board & Ors., in ML No.29/2018 titled Mohd Adil v. Delhi Wakf Board & Ors. and in ML No.28/2018 titled Afroznisha v. Delhi Wakf Board & Ors. Vide the said orders, the applications of Petitioners/Plaintiffs/Mehvish Adil, Mohd. Adil and Afroznisha (hereinafter collectively “Petitioners”) under Order XXXIX Rules 1&2 CPC were dismissed. Effectively, the prayer seeking injunction against the Waqf Board from dispossessing the Petitioners, from property being 1068, Ward No.l, Khasra no. 1151/3, Mehrauli, Delhi ad measuring 425 sq. yards (hereinafter “suit property”), was rejected. A brief background of the present proceedings is as below.
4. Initially, a notice was issued on 22nd January, 2007, against the Petitioners under Section 54 of the Waqf Act, by the Chief Executive Officer, Waqf Board, stating that the Petitioners were in unauthorized occupation of Waqf property. Therefore, they were directed to vacate the suit property, within 15 days of service of the order. Since the said notice was not complied with by the Petitioners, procedure for enforcement of the eviction orders was triggered under Section 55 of the Waqf Act. Accordingly, the Waqf Board made applications to the office of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Mehrauli), GNCTD (hereinafter “SDM”), seeking directions for removal of encroachments by the Petitioners under Section 55 of the Waqf Act. During the pendency of the enforcement of the said order dated 22nd January, 2007, the Petitioners entered into rent agreements with the Waqf Board on 16th October, 2008 and 5th November, 2008. Their tenancy itself came to an end by efflux of time in 2012. The Petitioners, however, continued to remain in occupation of the suit property.
5. In 2015, the Waqf Board filed proceedings before the High Court of Delhi, against the SDM in W.P. (C.)6275/2015 titled Delhi Waqf Board v. Principal Secretary, Revenue & Ors., seeking execution under Section 55 of the Waqf Act, of various eviction orders and encroachment proceedings pending over Waqf properties. In this petition, vide order dated 29th May, 2017, the High Court directed the SDM to execute pending eviction orders over Waqf properties. Pursuant to this order (wrongly written as 29th May, 2015 in this eviction notice), the SDM issued an eviction notice No.2/73/Teh./Meh/2018-19/128 dated 24th August, 2018, directing Mohd. Adil to vacate the suit premises.
6. It is the case of the Petitioners that this notice was not accompanied by the eviction order whic
Maria Margarida Sequeira Fernandes & Ors. v. Erasmo Jack De Sequeira (Dead) through LRs
Point of Law : Due process need not mean only an active process initiated by the owner of the property.
Discretionary relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not available in cases involving eviction from Waqf properties, and the court rejected the petitioner's contentions related to d....
The Waqf Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction over disputes involving Waqf properties, including tenant eviction, as per the amended Waqf Act, overriding state tenancy laws.
The Waqf Act empowers the Chief Executive Officer to address encroachments on Waqf properties, with exclusive jurisdiction for related disputes resting with Waqf tribunals.
Point of Law : The definition of the word ‘encroachment' under Section 54 of the Wakf Act and in para.7 to 12 defined the word ‘encroacher' and the power of Wakf Board under Section 54 of the Wakf Ac....
(1) Suit for permanent injunction in respect of Waqf property is maintainable before Waqf Tribunal.(2) Waqf Tribunal shall be deemed to be a Civil Court and shall have same powers as may be exercised....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the jurisdiction of the Waqf Tribunal was extended by the 2013 amendment to cover matters relating to eviction of tenants and determination of....
The main legal principle established is that the jurisdiction of the Civil Court, Revenue Court, and other authorities in respect of any dispute relating to a waqf property is barred by Section 85 of....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.