SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 99

G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
Haricharan Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Ms.Rishika Jha, Amicus Curiae.
For the Respondent: Mrs. Anita Kumari Singh, APP.

G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J.—The criminal appeal is filed against the judgment and order dated 08.12.2003, passed by the Adhoc Sessions Judge, Ist Fast Track Court, Siwan, in Sessions Trial No. 116 of 1985/140 of 2001, arising out of Case No. 48 of 1984 of Maharajganj PS, whereby the appellant No. 1 was convicted under Sections 148 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years. Further, appellants Nos. 2 and 3 were convicted under Sections 147 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code and were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year each.

2. As there is no assistance from the counsel for the appellants, this Court is constrained to appoint Ms. Rishika Jha as Amicus Curiae to assist the Court and has also called for a report from the Superintendent of Police, Siwan, to verify whether the appellants are alive or not? The Court has received a letter dated 23.12.2024 from the Superintendent of Police, Siwan, informing the Court that appellant No. 1, Haricharan Ram, passed away five years ago. The letter is accompanied with the report from the Mukhiya, confirming the death of the 1st appellant. Therefore, c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top