VIPUL M. PANCHOLI, ALOK KUMAR PANDEY
Mukesh Paswan @ Bimlesh Paswan @ Bhagat Ji – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Vipul M. Pancholi, J.—The present appeals have been filed under Section- 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as ‘Cr.P.C.’) challenging the judgment of conviction and order of sentence both dated 12.12.2018, whereby the appellants have been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections- 364A/34, 302/34, 201/34 and 302/120B of I.P.C. and the appellants have been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 10,000/- each for the offence punishable under Section-364A/34 of I.P.C. and, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo R.I. for six months each. Further, they have been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 10,000/- each for the offence punishable under Section- 302/34 of I.P.C. and, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo imprisonment for six months each. Further, they have been sentenced to undergo R.I. for three years and a fine of Rs. 2000/- each for the offence punishable under Section-201/34 of I.P.C. and, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo imprisonment for one month each. Further, they have been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life each for the offence punish
Ramanand @ Nandlal Bharti vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Haricharan Kurmi and Jogia Hajam vs. State of Bihar
Conviction based solely on confessions of co-accused is insufficient; prosecution must provide corroborating evidence establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.