SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 355

ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN, CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Sudhir Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, Sr. Adv.
For the Respondent: Mr.Sujit Kumar Singh, APP.

Chandra Shekhar Jha, J. – Heard Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, learned senior counsel for appellant and Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant-convict under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’) challenging the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 14.06.2019 passed by learned Fast Track Court-II, Civil Court, Lakhisarai in Sessions Trial No. 494B/2011 arising out of Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 565/2009 dated 09.11.2009 instituted under Sections 364(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code (in short the “I.P.C.”), whereby the concerned Trial Court has convicted the present appellant for the offences punishable under Section 364 of the I.P.C. and directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 10,000/- and in case of failure to deposit the fine, he shall to undergo S.I. of one month, the appellant is further convicted under Section 363 of the I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo R.I. for five years and to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/- and in default of payment of fine, he shall undergo S.I. for 15 days, thereafter, the appel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top