IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA, J.
Criminal Misc. No. 25152 of 2024
(3.3.2025)
Manoj Kumar Singh ... Petitioner
vs.
State of Bihar & Anr. ... Opp. Parties
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 482 – Quashing of order taking cognizance for the offence alleged to have been committed under Section 409/34 I.P.C. and Section 7 E.C. Act – Seven trucks loaded with Custom Milled Rice alleged to have been embezelled – After investigation the S.D.P.O., Fulparas, exonerated the petitioner from crime in question but, only on the basis of supervision note, without having any further materials, the charge-sheet was submitted against the petitioner out of oblique motive, as upon his persuation, the D.M. Madhubani getting prima facie fact correct, lodged Ghoghardiha P.S. case against the officials of BSFC – Further, the matter was decided effectively through arbitration between the parties, being a commercial dispute, where all orders of BSFC was set aside and was directed to pay Rs. 1,19,17,687.57 to the petitioner – It can safely be said that out of oblique and ulterior motive to save their own officials, the BSFC/informant lodged the present case against the petitioner and particularly, in view of arbitration award, where all issues between the parties appears settled, showing all balance in favour of petitioner, the continuing with present criminal proceeding before the learned Trial Court qua petitioner would only amount to abuse of the process of Court of law – Accordingly, the revisional order as well as the order taking cognizance set aside against the petitioner – Application allowed. (Paras 22 to 25)
Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.—Heard Mr. Rana Vikram Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, learned A.P.P. for the State duly assisted by Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2/B.S.F.C.
2. The present application has been filed by the petitioner for setting aside the order dated 15.12.2023 passed by 9th/3rd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madhubani in Criminal Revision No.274 of 2023, whereby the learned trial court has affirmed the order dated 21.09.2023 passed by learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur and rejected the revision application of the petitioner as well as for quashing the cognizance order dated 21.09.2023 passed by learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharpur, through which learned Jurisdictional Magistrate has taken cognizance under Sections 409, 420 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code (in short ‘I.P.C.’) and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (in short ‘E.C. Act’) in connection with Ghoghardiha P.S. Case No.51 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Section 409/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 7 of the E.C. Act.
3. The prosecution, in short, that one Om Prakash, Assistant Manager of the State Food Corporation (in short “Corporation”) filed a fardbeyan on 09.05.2019 before the Officer-in-Charge of Ghoghardiha Police Station stated therein that on 08.05.2019, seven trucks loaded with Custom Milled Rice (in short ‘CMR’) from Ghoghardih Godown were handed over to Shri Kumud Kumar Pandey, the representative of Manoj Kumar Singh (petitioner), the Logistic Contractor (Chief). It is further stated that all seven trucks loaded with 4700 bags weighing 2350 quintals of CMR were to be delivered to different godowns of the Corporation in that area but, they were not delivered within the specified time. It is further stated that the Logistic Contractor embezzled all the CMR during transportation in connivance with his representative and drivers.
4. On the basis of aforesaid fardbeyan, the present First Information Report (in short ‘F.I.R.’) was registered against the petitioner and others for the alleged offences punishable under Section 409/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 7 of the E.C. Act and it was registered as Ghoghardiha P.S. Case No.51 of 2019 dated 09.05.2019.
5. Mr. Rana Vikram Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner while arguing this matter submitted that on the day of occurrence i.e. on 08.05.2019 petitioner had gone to Bangalore for the admission of his son in Engineering College and he was completely unaware about the alleged incidence/occurrence. It is submitted that the informant himself in connivance with the employee of the petitioner without having knowledge of the petitioner misappropriated the alleged consignment of food-grains (CMR) and make petitioner himself as a victim of the circumstances. It is pointed out that when the occurrence came into the knowledge of the petitioner by his representative, he immediately came back from Bangluru and made inquiry at his personal level. On his own effort, the petitioner recovered all seven trucks and 1777 quintals of rice, which was handed over to the Department but, despite of same, the investigating agency after completion of investigation, submitted Charge-sheet No.80/2019 dated 31.07.2019 and sent up this petitioner for trial, making him as one of the accused of the occurrence.
6. Mr. Rana Vikram Singh, further submitted that the District Magistrate, Madhubani also got the matter inquired and clearly opined that there was a clear conspiracy in which officials of the Corporation were found involved and, therefore, a separate F.I.R. was also lodged against the officials and, accordingly, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against the officials of the Corporation. It is submitted that as delivery of rice was made by the Corporation at about 8 P.M. i.e. beyond the working hours and Global Positioning System (in short ‘G.P.S.’) and tracking dev
At the stage of considering charges, the accused cannot rely on materials by way of defense, and the power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be used for a mini trial.
Prima facie evidence of cheating under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code was sufficient for the Trial Court to take cognizance and proceed with the case.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that at the stage of consideration of charge, an accused cannot rely on materials by way of defense, and the power under Section 482 of the Code of....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.