SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 164

MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
Vijay Prakash @ Vijay Prakash – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner: M/s Shyam Kishore, Rishi Sinha.
For the Respondents: Mr. Sarvesh Kr. Singh, AAG-13.

Mohit Kumar Shah, J. – The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 10.01.2024 passed by the learned Court of Collector, Araria in Deficit Stamp Recovery Case No. 14 of 2023, whereby and whereunder the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs. 10,94,800/- on the head of deficit stamp duty plus a sum of Rs. 1,09,480/- by way of penalty charges, totalling to a sum of Rs. 12,04,280/-.

2. The brief facts of the case, according to the petitioner, are that the petitioner purchased a piece of residential land situated at Mauza-Rampur Nagar Parishad, Thana- Forbesganj, Thana No. 142, appertaining to Khata No. 130, Khesra No. 263, admeasuring 34 decimals, from Priya Niwesh Pvt. Ltd. through its Director namely Mahendra Kumar Maroti, after paying sale consideration amount to the tune of Rs. 58,65,000/- (Rupees Fifty Eight Lakhs Sixty Five Thousand) and after payment of the requisite stamp duty and registration charges, the sale deed was registered by the office of the Sub- Registrar, Forbesganj, District-Araria i.e. the respondent no. 8, on 15.10.2018.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that at the time the aforesaid land was purchased by th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top