SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 357

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
PURNENDU SINGH, J.
Rajesh Kumar Son of Late Harindra Kumar Sing @ Late Harendra Singh - Appellant 
Versus
The State of Bihar - Respondent 
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5999 of 2021
Decided on : 25-03-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr.Madhaw Prasad Yadaw, Mr.Meera Singh, Mr. Rajesh Kr. Chaudhary, Advocate

Compassionate appointments are contingent on the policies effective at the time of the employee's death, and not a right to enhanced benefits based on subsequent pay scales.

Headnote:(A) Relevant Law and Sections: Constitution of India - Article 14 - Principles of compassionate appointment as guided by State Government Circulars and resolutions.

(B) Key Legal Principles: Compassionate appointments are not automatic and are subject to statutory scrutiny; the applicable pay scale is determined by the date of the employee's death and the policies in effect at that time.

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought the compensation scale following his father's death in harness and argued for equal pay with other similarly situated store keepers. He was appointed on compassionate grounds post his father's demise. The University contended the applicable pay scale was Rs. 3050-4590/- based on the regulations at the time of his father’s death.

Findings of Court:
The applicable pay scale for the petitioner is determined to be Rs. 3050-4590/- as per the relevant policies in accordance with the date of the father’s death.

Issues: The central issue was whether the petitioner is entitled to a higher pay scale than that fixed by the University, based on the principles governing compassionate appointments.

Ratio Decidendi: The petitioner is entitled to the pay scale relevant at the time of his father’s demise, and compassionate appointments are to be governed strictly by existing policies; earlier approvals for higher pay scales do not constitute a vested right.

Result: Writ petition disposed of, subject to the outcome of a related larger bench case.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's claims based on compassionate appointment. (Para 2 , 3)
2. dispute over applicable pay scale for compassionate appointees. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court’s observations regarding the law of compassionate appointments. (Para 6)
4. determination of applicable pay scales based on prior case law. (Para 7)
5. apex court's guidance on criteria for determining pay scale. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 12)
6. legal precedent on compassionate appointments and pay scales. (Para 11 , 13 , 14)
7. writ petition ruling deferred pending larger bench decision. (Para 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT :

PURNENDU SINGH, J.

Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner; Mr. Madhav Prasad Yadav, learned GP-23 for the State and Mr.Rajesh Kumar Chaudhary, Learned counsel for the Veer Kunwar Singh University.

2. The Petitioner in paragraph no.1 of the present writ petition has sought inter alia following relief(s), which is reproduced hereinafter:

“(I) For issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the Memo No.Legal/60/19/Estab./585/19/1383/ Estab./19 dated 14.05.2019/20.05.2019 passed by Registrar, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Ara/Respondent no.4 whereby he wrongly held that the petitioner is not entitled to the pay scale of Rs.5500-9900/- whereas the pay scale for the post of Store Keeper is Rs.5500-9900/ and at present also the respondent authorities are paying pay scale of Rs.5500-9900/ to other similarly situated persons i.e., store keeper of Shershah College, Sasaram. Therefore, the petitioner is also entitled for Pay scale of 9300-34800/-( Grade pay 4600).

(II) For issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to pay all the arrear of salary / differences of salary to the petitioner, which is dues, due to non-payment of admissible pay scale to the petitioner and petitioner is also entitled to get 18% interest over the dues amount.

(iii) For grant of any reliefs the petitioner would be found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

3. The brief facts of the case are that the father of the petitioner, namely, late Harinder Kumar Singh, had died in harness on 14.08.2007, while he was working on the post of 'Store Keeper' in Shershah College, Sasaram, which comes under Veer Kunwar Singh University, Ara (hereinafter referred to as the 'University'). The petitioner had applied for considering his appointment on compassionate ground and the Compassionate Appointment Committee vide its decision dated 08.03.2008 had recommended for compassionate appointment of the petitioner, subsequent to which, the Registrar of the University had issued an order for appointment of petitioner vide Memo No. 282 dated 29.03.2008. Thereafter, the petitioner had joined on 02.04.2008 on the post of 'Store Keeper' in Shershah College, Sasaram. Learned counsel further submitted that Memo No. 1139 dated 18.06.2014 was issued by the Joint Secretary, Education Department, to all the Registrar of the Universities of Bihar for providing the scale of Rs. 5500-9000/- w.e.f. 01.04.2009 to the 'Store Keepers', subsequent to which, a notification was issued by the University vide Memo No. 665 dated 22.08.2014 for providing the pay scale of Rs. 5500-9000/- w.e.f. 01.04.1997 to the 'Store Keepers', who have been validly appointed with requisite qualifications against sanctioned posts. Petitioner having not given the said benefit had preferred CWJC No. 13580 of 2017 before a co-ordiante Bench of this Court, which was disposed of on 05.03.2019 with a direction to the petitioner to file detailed representation before the Registrar of the University. Thereafter, the petitioner had filed representation before the Registrar of the University on 01.04.2019, which was rejected vide Memo No. 19 dated 20.05.2019, which was communicated to the petitioner and other office bearers of the University. Aggrieved by the said order, the petitioner has fi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top