SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Pat) 1213

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Ashutosh Kumar, Jitendra Kumar, JJ.
Krishna Yadav @ Megha Yadav, S/o- Chhabila Yadav and ors. - Appellants
Versus
The State of Bihar - Respondents
Criminal Appeal (DB) No.731 of 2018, Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 791 of 2018, Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 798 of 2018, Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 804 of 2018, Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 821 of 2018
Decided On : 30-09-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Adv., Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Adv., Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, Adv
For the Respondent: Mr. Satya Narayan Prasad, APP
For the Informant : Mr. Ashok Kumar Verma, Adv.

The court reaffirmed the principle that a prosecution case must be proven beyond reasonable doubt; contradictions in witness testimony necessitated acquittal due to reasonable doubt.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 148, 302/149, 323/149, 324/149 - Conviction and sentencing of six appellants for rioting and murder - Evidence examined included testimonies of prosecution witnesses and cross-examinations verifying circumstances of the incident, leading to reasonable doubt regarding the prosecution's assertions. (Paras 10, 55)

Facts of the case:
The appellants were charged in connection with the murder of Amit Kumar arising from a physical altercation after a dispute regarding payment at a tea shop. The informant alleged multiple assaults on his brother, leading to fatal injuries caused by several accused with various weapons. (Paras 1-4)

Findings of Court:
Trial court convicted the appellants based on witness testimonies, but upon thorough examination, evidence was found insufficient to sustain the conviction beyond reasonable doubt. Testimonies showed inconsistencies about the incident, weapon use, and presence of witnesses. (Paras 54, 55)

Issues: The court considered whether there was sufficient evidence beyond reasonable doubt to affirm the lower court's conviction or whether the accused were entitled to the benefit of doubt. (Paras 55, 56)

Ratio Decidendi: The appellate court found the prosecution's case riddled with inconsistencies and contradictions, particularly in witness statements and lack of corroborating evidence, leading to the conclusion that the charges against the appellants were not proven beyond reasonable doubt. (Paras 54, 56)

Result: Appeals allowed; the appellants were acquitted of all charges and directed to be released if not required under other cases. (Paras 56-58)

Table of Content
1. description of the factual background and proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
3. principles regarding evidence evaluation and witness credibility. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
4. the court's analysis and findings on witness reliability and evidence. (Para 39 , 40 , 46 , 52 , 53)
5. final judgment, acquittal of the appellants. (Para 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60)

JUDGMENT :

JITENDRA KUMAR, J.

All the appeals have been taken up together as they have been preferred against the same impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 05.05.2018 and 07.05.2018 respectively, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-Vth, Siwan, in Sessions Case No. 475 of 2016 arising out of Pachrukhi Sarai P.S. Case No. 99 of 2015, whereby all six appellants have been found guilty for the offence punishable under Sections 148 , 323/149, 324/149 and 302/149 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- each under Section 302 /149 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE . All the appellants have been further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- each under Section 148 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE . They have been further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for eight months and to pay a fine of Rs.800/- each for offence punishable under Section 323 /149 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE . However, no separate punishment has been passed under Section 324 /149 of the IPC. In case of default to pay the fine, all the appellants have been directed to undergo an additional rigorous imprisonment for one year. All the sentences have been directed to run concurrently. By the order of sentence, fifty per cent of the fine has also been directed to pay to Santosh Kumar Singh and Sanjay Kumar Singh who are brothers of the deceased, Amit Kumar.

Prosecution case

2. The prosecution case as emerging from the Fardbeyan of the informant recorded by S.I, S.N. Singh, SHO Sarai O.P. on 25.04.2015 at 23:00 O’clock at Sadar Hospital, Siwan, is that he runs tent and tea shop at village market. He was at that shop at 7:00 P.M. Some villagers of Nawada were eating Bhoonja (fried grains) from the shop of Sugriv Sah and when the shopkeeper Sugriv Sah asked for the payment of the price, they abused him. Upon this, shopkeepers from the vicinity assembled and requested them to pay the price to the poor shopkeeper. Upon this, they got angry and threatened of dire consequences and they went to their village and after half an hour, the appellants besides Ajit and Hiralal Yadav and 3-4 unknown persons came and started beating the shopkeepers and villagers. Consequently, Swaminath Sah, Munna Singh, Sanjay Kumar Sah and some other persons sustained injuries. In the meantime, Amit Kumar, younger brother of the informant was coming after attending the call of nature. Seeing him, Harishankar Chaudhary stated that he is brother of the tea shopkeeper and exhorted other to finish him. Hearing this, Krishna Yadav @ Megha Yadav who was carrying Kulhari (Axe) in his hand assaulted his brother on head with intent to kill him. Subsequently, he got badly injured and fell on the road. Thereafter, they started beating him by dangerous arms in their hands. Consequently, his brother got unconscious. He took his brother to Sadar Hospital with the help of the villagers where from he was referred to Gorakhpur Hospital. On the way to Gorakhpur, in ambulance, his brother died near Gopalganj. He came back to Sadar Hospital with dead body of his brother and gave his fardbeyan. The occurrence has been seen by him besides shopkeepers and many villagers in the light of electricity.

Factual Background

3. On the basis of the Fardbeyan of the informant, Pachrukhi Sarai P.S. Case No. 99 of 2015 was registered on 26.04.2015 against 8 named accused persons including the appellants herein and 3-4 unknown persons for the offence punish

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top