IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
P. B. Bajanthri, S. B. PD. Singh, JJ.
Sunil Kumar, son of Kamleshwar Yadav - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar through the Secretary Prohibition and Excise Department and ors. - Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15682 of 2024
Decided On : 17-01-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. vehicle ownership and theft details (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. contested confiscation and appeal process (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. statutory provisions for vehicle seizure (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. conditions for vehicle confiscation not met (Para 23 , 24) |
| 5. order for vehicle release granted (Para 25 , 26) |
JUDGMENT :
S. B. PD. SINGH, J.
In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-
i) To set aside the order dated 15.02.2024 passed by the learned Assistant Commissioner of Excise, Gaya in Memo No. 125 dated 01.04.2023 in Excise Confiscation Case No. 841/2022, and the order dated 03.07.2023 passed by the Excise Commissioner, Patna in Excise Appeal Case No. 89/2023 in connection with Dobhi P.S. Case No. 663/22.
(ii) To direct the respondents to release the seized Mahindra Bolero bearing Registration No. JH03L-5222, Engine No. GHF4A55091, Chassis No. MA1XA2GHKF5A22539, in favour of the petitioner, which was stolen on 18.02.2022 from the house of the brother in law of the petitioner and seized by Dobhi, Gaya PS on 30/07/2022.
(iii) To grant any other relief (s) as deemed appropriate under the law.
2. The relevant facts of the case as emerging from the record are that petitioner is the owner of Mahindra Bolero vehicle bearing Chasis no. MA1XA2GHKF5A22539, Engine no. GHF4A55091 which was registered with the Transport Department with Registration No. JH03L-5222. On 18.02.2022. The Bolero vehicle of the petitioner was stolen from the residence of his brother-in-law namely Ankit Kumar. The petitioner, thereafter registered Nokha P.S. Case No. 47 of 2022 (Annexure-1) under Section 379 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE on 20.02.2022.
3. Further case of the petitioner is that the vehicle of the petitioner was later found with a new number plate bearing JH09F-2828 and it was seized by the Dobhi Police Station on 30.07.2022 for the alleged recovery of 1035 Kgs of Mahua Flower and 05 litres of illicit liquor and Dobhi P.S. Case No. 663 of 2022 (Annexure-2) was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise(Amendment) Act, 2018.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that without prior notice to the petitioner, the seized vehicle was confiscated by the Assistant Commissioner, Excise, Gaya in Excise Confiscation Case No. 841 of 2022 (Annexure-3). It is further submitted that as soon as the petitioner became aware of seizure of vehicle under Bihar Prohibition & Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, he approached the Excise Court, Gaya who directed the Investigating Officer to submit a report in this regard. The Investigating Officer has submitted the report on 07.05.2023 (Annexure-4) stating that the petitioner had no role in the crime and the vehicle was stolen from the house of petitioner’s brother-in-law and Nokha P.S. Case No. 47 of 2022 was registered in this regard.
5. The petitioner, thereafter filed an appeal before Excise Commissioner, Bihar in Excise Appeal Case No. 89 of 2023. The Excise Commissioner, vide order dated 03.07.2023 (Annexure-7) directed the seized vehicle to be released after imposition of appropriate penalty as may be decided by the District Collector, Gaya, after submission of prescribed form under BIHAR PROHIBITION AND EXCISE RULES , 2021 by the owner of the vehicle. The petitioner, thereafter filed an application (Annexure-5) before the Excise Commissioner, Patna stating that his vehicle was stolen and F.I.R was registered in this regard. During investigation, the involvement of the petitioner was not found in the alleged crime under Excise Act and it was found that his vehicle was used with another false number plate by the accused and imposing a penalty of Rs. 48000/- is unjust and improper. However, no action was taken on the aforesaid application dated 03.04.2024.
6. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent submitted that vehicle of the petitioner was confiscated in a confiscation proceeding after giving prop
Confiscation of a vehicle under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act requires direct involvement of the owner in the offense; without such involvement, confiscation orders are deemed arbitrary and un....
Confiscation of a vehicle under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act requires evidence of the owner's consent or involvement in illegal activities; failure to establish this renders confiscation inva....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for timely initiation and conclusion of confiscatory proceedings under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, with specific timeframes prov....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.