Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Arun Kumar Jha
Birendra Prasad Saha son of Late Surya Narayan Saha – Appellant
Versus
Ghanshyam Kumar Yadav Son of Sri Surendra Prasad Yadav – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Arun Kumar Jha, J.
Heard both the parties.
2. The present civil miscellaneous petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:-
“(i) For the quashing/setting aside the order dated 19.08.2017 passed in Eviction Suit No. 41 of 2015 by learned Munsif, Udakishunganj. District whereby whereunder the learned Munsif, Udakishunganj has been Madhepura and pleased to reject the petition dated 18.08.2016 under Section 14 (4) of Bihar Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982 (the Act hereinafter for the sake of brevity) filed by the plaintiff/petitioner.
(ii) For the direction that the written statement of the respondent cannot be accepted in the present sets of facts and for the further direction to proceed the case as per the Special Procedure for disposal of cases for eviction on the ground of bona fide requirement and expiry of lease.
(iii) For the issuance of any other appropriate relief/(s)/order/(s)/direction/ (s) which your Lordships may deem fit in the present facts and circumstances of the case.”
3. Briefly stated facts of the case, culled out from the record, are that the petitioner filed Eviction Suit No. 41 of 2015 on 17.06.2015 before the court of learned
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
