IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Vipul M.Pancholi, Partha Sarthy
Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Subhash Singh S/o Late Jeonath Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vipul M. Pancholi, CJ.
I.A. No.01 of 2024
This application is filed under Section-5 of the LIMITATION ACT for condonation of delay of 43 days in preferring the present appeal.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants/appellants and learned counsel for the respondent.
3. We have considered the submissions canvassed by learned counsel for the parties and gone through the averments made in the present interlocutory application.
4. In view of the averments made in this petition and the submissions canvassed by the learned counsel for the applicants/appellants, we are of the view that the applicants/appellants have shown sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal within the time of limitation.
5. Accordingly, this interlocutory application is allowed. Delay of 43 days caused in preferring the present appeal is condoned.
L.P.A. No.317 of 2024
The present appeal has been filed under Clause-X of the Letters Patent of Patna High Court Rules against the order dated 15.01.2024, rendered by the learned Single Judge in CWJC No.19779 of 2015, whereby the learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition filed by the present opponent/original writ petitioner and thereby directed the pre
Deepali Gundu Surwase Vs. Kranti Junior Adhyapak Mahavidyalaya (D.ED) & Ors.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.