SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 448

P. B. BAJANTHRI, S. B. PD. SINGH
Shams Tabrej – Appellant
Versus
Isarat Jahan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Mahta Alam.
For the Respondent: M/s Bashishtha Narayan Mishra, Avinash Raj, Braj Kishor Mishra.

S. B. Pd. Singh, J. – Heard the parties.

2. The present appeal has been filed under Section 19(1) of the Family Court Act, 1984 impugning the judgment and decree dated 28.02.2017 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, West Champaran at Bettiah in Title Suit No. 198 of 2007 filed under Section 308 of the Muslim Law and under Sections 7(1)(A) of the Family Court’s Act for declaration of divorce since 08.10.2007 on the basis of pronouncement made by the appellant to the respondent, which was dismissed by the Family Court.

3. The case of the appellant as per petition filed before the Family Court is that the appellant-Shams Tabrej has filed a petition under Section 308 of the Muslim Law and 7(1)(A) of Family Court's Act against the respondent-Isarat Jahan on 29.10.2007 stating therein that both the parties were married on 12.1.2000 and they started leading peaceful conjugal life and two sons were born out of their wedlock. After some time, the respondent changed herself as a quarrelsome lady and always used to stay at her parental house. The appellant is a poor person working as a Salesman at a shoe shop and that was the reason, the respondent used to stay at her parents’ house

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top