ARUN KUMAR JHA
Arun Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Abhimanyu Prasad Singh – Respondent
Arun Kumar Jha, J. – The instant civil miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioners for setting aside the order dated 09.08.2023 passed by learned Munsif, Civil Court, Aurangabad in Title Suit No. 87 of 2000, whereby and whereunder the learned trial court has allowed the amendment application dated 31.03.2023 filed by the plaintiff/respondent under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’).
2. The factual matrix of the case, in short, is that the respondent filed Title Suit No. 87 of 2000, challenging the gift deed dated 04.02.1972 executed by father of the plaintiff in favour of defendant nos. 1 and 2, seeking declaration that the gift deed was inoperative and void. The suit has been filed against the petitioners who have been made defendant nos. 1 and 2 and the defendant no. 3 was father of defendant nos. 1 and 2. During pendency of the suit, respondent filed an application for amendment of plaint on 30.11.2009, challenging another gift deed dated 04.02.1972 executed by father of the respondent in favour of one Anju Lata Singh but the said amendment application was withdrawn on 21.01.2012 with submission that a fresh amendme
Radhika Devi vs. Bajrangi Singh
T.N. Alloy Foundry Co. Ltd. vs. T.N. Electricity Board
Mohinder Kumar Mehra vs. Roop Rani Mehra
Mahila Ramkali Devi vs. Nandram (Dead) through Lrs.
L.J. Leach & Co. Ltd. vs. Jardine Skinner and Co.
Baldev Singh vs. Manohar Singh
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.