KHATIM REZA
Deonandan Yadav @ Deonarayan Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Baliram Gop – Respondent
Khatim Reza, J. – Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the respondent.
2. This Second Appeal has been filed by the defendant/appellants/appellants against the judgment and decree dated 20.06.2019 passed in Partition Title Appeal No. 18 of 2008/115 of 2018 by the Additional District Judge-III, Aurangabad, whereby, the learned Appellate Court has affirmed the judgment and decree dated 30.04.2008 passed by the Sub-Judge-I, Aurangabad in Partition Suit No. 172 of 2004, decreeing the suit of the plaintiff/respondent.
3. In this appeal, the following substantial questions of law have been formulated for determination: –
(I) Whether the learned Appellate Court passed the judgment in violation of mandatory provision of law under Order XLI Rule 31 of Code of Civil Procedure when it did not formulate any point of determination?
(II) Whether the decision of the learned Appellate Court is not supported by the independent reasons as while affirming the judgment and decree of the learned Trial Court, the learned Appellate Court has just copied the decision made by the learned Trial Court.?
4. In order to gauge the matter in its correct perspective, it is necessary to brie
Janardhan Narasimha Nayak vs. Balwant Venaktesh Kulkarni
Parmanand Yadav vs Jagdeo Yadav
Malluru Mallappa (Dead) Through Legal Representatives vs. Kuruvathappa
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.