SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Pat) 483

ASHUTOSH KUMAR, PARTHA SARTHY
State of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Shardendu Bhushan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Santosh Kumar Mishra, AC to SC 26
For the Respondent: Mr. Manoj Kumar Ambastha.

Partha Sarthy, J. –

Re: I.A. no. 2 of 2025

The instant application has been filed on behalf of the State of Bihar/Appellant for condoning the delay of 99 days in filing of the instant appeal.

2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the contents of the petition, the Court is satisfied that the appellant has made out a case for condonation of delay. The delay in filing of the appeal is condoned.

3. I.A. no. 2 of 2025 stands allowed.

Re:L.P.A. no. 186 of 2025

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

5. The instant appeal has been preferred by the appellant against the judgment dated 7.10.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby while allowing CWJC no. 12763 of 2018, he was pleased to set aside the order contained in notification no. 8643(S) Patna, dated 20.11.2018 of the Deputy Secretary (Vigilance), Road Construction Department, Bihar whereby the writ petitioner/respondent was dismissed from service and also quashed the order contained in notification no. 1065(S) dated 29.1.2019 issued under the signature of the Deputy Secretary (Vigilance), Road Construction Department, Bihar whereby the review preferred by the respondent was rejected.

6. The relevant fac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top