IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA, J.
Chairman, Reliance General Insurance Company Limited - Appellant
Versus
Kaushalya Devi and Ors w/o Lt. Sitaram Sah - Respondent
Miscellaneous Appeal No.712 of 2018
Decided On : 24-06-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judgment details and compensation awarded. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. circumstances of the accident and claimants' assertions. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. insurance company arguments on compensation calculation. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. legal standards for calculating compensation. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. reassessment of compensation based on legal precedents. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. final decision on appeal and modification of prior judgment. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
JUDGMENT :
RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA, J.
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant as well as the learned counsel for the respondents.
2. Miscellaneous Appeal No. 712 of 2018 has been filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as “Act”) on behalf of the appellants/Insurance Company against the judgment and award dated 28.02.2017 and 07.06.2017 passed by the learned District Judge-cum-Motor Vehicle Accident Claim Tribunal, Madhepura (hereinafter referred to as “Learned Tribunal”) in M.V. Claim Case No. 35 of 2011 (CIS No. 532 of 2013) wherein learned Tribunal allowed the claim application and awarded Rs. 18,83,000/- as compensation along with 9% per annum as an interest from the date of filing of the claim case till realization of the compensation amount after adjusting the amount, if already paid to the applicants as interim compensation under Section 140 of the Act.
3. The learned Tribunal held that the appellants are entitled to receive Rs. 18,83,000/- as compensation and accordingly the Reliance General Insurance Company limited / respondent no. 2 has been directed to make payment of the compensation amount as per the order forthwith, along with simple interest 9% interest per annum from the date of filling of the case.
4. The details of the calculation of compensation amount made by the learned Tribunal are as under:
| Sr. No. | Heads | Calculation | Net Amount |
| 1. | Monthly income | Rs. 6000/- | |
| 2. | Annual Income | 12 * 6000 | Rs. 72,000/- |
| 3. | 1/4th deduction towards personal and living expenses | Rs, 18,000 | |
| 4. | Future prospect Deceased aged about 30 years Multiplier of 18 is applicable | 50% Rs. 81,000*18 | Rs. 81,000/- Rs.14,58,000/- |
| 6. | Los of consortium | Rs. 1,00,000/- | |
| 7. | Loss of Estate | Rs. 1,00,000/- | |
| 8. | Loss of Guardianship, love and affection | Rs. 1,00,000/- | |
| 9. | Loss of Funeral | Rs. 25,000/- | |
| 10. | Total amount of compensation | Rs.18,83,000/- |
5. The brief facts of the case as per the claimants are that the deceased, Shaini Sah, was employed as a handyman (khalasi) under the Opposite Party No. 1. On 13.07.2011, while discharging his duties, he was accompanying a vehicle transporting EFSW pipes from Shivsagar to Duliaganj (Assam) via National Highway No. 37. During transit, the loaded pipes became loose and struck the driver’s cabin with considerable force, resulting in the instantaneous death of both the driver, Raj Kishore Sah @ Kumar, and the handyman, Shaini Sah, near Tiloi, close to Kali Mandir (Assam). Further, the incident was reported and registered on dated 13.07.2011 bearing Moran P.S. Case No. 318 of 2011. The postmortem of the deceased was conducted at Assam Medical College, Dibrugarh, by an Assistant Professor from the Department of Forensic Medicine. The dead body was subsequently handed over to the family members. The Motor Vehicle Inspector (MVI) from the District Transport Office, Dibrugarh, conducted an inspection on the same day and confirmed the occurrence of the accident in his report dated 13.07.2011. Additionally, the Forensic Department issued a certificate following the postmortem, and the Officer- in-Charge of Moran Police Station prepared an Accident Information Report, which recorded the particulars of the accident, vehicle involved, and identification details of the deceased.
6. Claimant No.1 (mother), Claimant No.2 (wife), Claimant No.3 and 4 (minor daughter of deceased) through their mother, and Claimant No. 5 (Father) have filed petition bearing M.V. Claim Case No. 35 of 2011 before Motor Vehicle Accident Claim Tribunal, Madhepura claiming that the accident took place due to rash and
Laxmi Devi & Ors. v. Md. Tabbar and Anr.
Kirti and Anr. v. Oriental Insurance company Ltd.
Sanichari Devi & Anr. v. Sanjay Kumar Yadav & Anr.
United India Insurance Company Ltd. v. Shila Dutta & Ors.
National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay Sethi and others
Shankarayya and another vs. United India Insurance Company Limited and another reported
Ramchandrappa v. Manager Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited
Sarla Verma and Ors v. Delhi Transport Corporation and Anr.
Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram
United India Insurance Company Ltd. v. Satindar Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur and Ors.
The court confirmed that in compensation claims for unskilled labor, minimum wages should be utilized for calculating income when proof is absent, emphasizing methodical assessment of claimants' depe....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on oral testimony to determine the deceased's income and the application of established legal principles to modify the compensation am....
Appellate courts can enhance compensation in motor accident claims even without a cross-appeal, where just compensation principles apply, considering established evidence of income and deductions.
In absence of documentary proof, minimum wage notifications serve as a basis for income assessment in compensation claims.
Age of deceased should be basis for applying multiplier.
The court established that compensation must be assessed based on accurate income calculations and relevant legal precedents, ensuring just compensation.
LMV licence suffices for transport vehicle under 7500kg GVW sans endorsement; self-employed carpenter notional income Rs.800/day on oral evidence; 1/4th personal expenses deduction (4 dependents); 10....
The court emphasized the necessity of awarding just and fair compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, considering future prospects and adjusting interest rates appropriately.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.