IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
JIYA LAL BHARDWAJ
United India Insurance Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kaushalya Devi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. fatal accident killed pedestrian carpenter by vehicle. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. deceased negligent; invalid license, no permit alleged. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. tribunal holds negligence, awards rs.33.11 lakhs. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. appeal challenges license, income proof, computation. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. lmv license suffices for <7500kg transport vehicle. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. rs.800/day income for carpenter via oral evidence. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. 1/4th deduction; 10% prospects; rs.50k consortium. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 8. 9% interest upheld per supreme court rulings. (Para 28) |
| 9. award modified to rs.28.53 lakhs total. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT :
JIYA LAL BHARDWAJ, J.
Challenge in the present appeal is against the award dated 08.06.2015, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(II), Una, District Una, H.P., whereby the claim petition bearing No. MAC Petition RBT No. 144/2014, titled, Kaushalya Devi and others vs. Ashwani Kumar and others, preferred by the claimants was allowed and they were awarded a sum of Rs. 33,11,000/-, along with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till deposit of the award amount
National Insurance Company Limited vs. Pranay Sethi and others
Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Company Limited vs. Rambha Devi and others
Sarla Verma (SMT) and others versus Delhi Transport Corporation and another
Magma General Insurance Company Limited vs. Nanu Ram alias Chuhru Ram and others
LMV licence suffices for transport vehicle under 7500kg GVW sans endorsement; self-employed carpenter notional income Rs.800/day on oral evidence; 1/4th personal expenses deduction (4 dependents); 10....
Unchallenged oral evidence proves deceased's income despite no documents; 40% future prospects for self-employed under 40; conventional heads fixed at Rs.50,000/- consortium, Rs.20,000/- estate/funer....
Exoneration of an insurer based on the absence of a driver's license is erroneous; conductors of dumpers do not require such a license under applicable motor vehicle laws.
The court established that in calculating compensation for motor accident claims, future income prospects should be considered, deductions for personal expenses must reflect the actual number of depe....
The court emphasized that in compensation claims, oral testimony can substantiate income claims in the absence of documentary evidence, ensuring just compensation principles are adhered to.
Point of law: Motor Vehicles –Motor Vehicles Act is a beneficial legislation aimed at providing relief to the victims or their families, in cases of genuine claims. In case where a parent has lost th....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the re-assessment of notional income and enhancement of compensation under various heads to ensure just and reasonable compensation for the claiman....
The court established that compensation for motor vehicle accidents must accurately reflect the deceased's income and provide just interest rates, ensuring fair compensation for claimants.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the assessment of just compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, considering the deceased's income and other relevant factors....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.