Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
VIPUL M.PANCHOLI, SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
Munni Devi Wife of Sarjun Chaudhary – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Gaya, District - Gaya Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal filed due to judgment of acquittal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of fir and evidence presented. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments concerning reliability of evidence. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. witness testimonies and their credibility. (Para 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 5. issues with fir and subsequent investigations. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 6. witness claims accidental death. (Para 19) |
| 7. legal principles regarding presumption of innocence. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 8. dismissal of appeal based on lack of evidence. (Para 23 , 24) |
JUDGMENT :
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIPUL M. PANCHOLI)
The present appeal has been filed by the appellant/original informant under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’) against the judgment of acquittal dated 09.09.2024 rendered by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-I, Sherghati, Gaya in Sessions Trial No.138/2022/950/2023, arising out of Gurua P.S. Case No.178/2020, whereby the respondents-accused have been acquitted by the learned Trial Court.
2. Heard Mr. Mahendra Thakur, learned Advocate for the appellant-informant and Mr. Satya Narayan Prasad, learned APP for the Respondent-State.
3. Mr. Mahendra Thakur, learne
The appellate court upheld the acquittal, emphasizing that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, highlighting the presumption of innocence.
An appellate court may reappraise evidence in acquittal appeals but maintains double presumption of innocence, requiring clear support for findings before altering trial court decisions.
In acquittal appeals, the prosecution bears the burden to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, with a double presumption in favor of the accused, making it difficult to overturn a trial court's acqui....
The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to contradictions in eyewitness testimonies, leading to the affirmation of the trial court's acquittal.
The principles governing appeals against acquittal emphasize the presumption of innocence and the necessity for the prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, with the appellate court exer....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that in an appeal against acquittal, the appellate court should not disturb the findings of acquittal recorded by the trial court if two reasonable....
The presumption of innocence must prevail in appeals against acquittal, requiring compelling evidence to overturn a trial court's decision.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
