Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
KHATIM REZA
Most. Lal Muni Devi, W/o. of Late Ramkishun Singh – Appellant
Versus
Murahu Singh, son of Ram Lochan Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. second appeal filed against lower courts' judgments. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. substantial questions of law framed for determination. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. plaintiff's genealogical and property claims detailed. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. arguments addressing validity of gift deed. (Para 8 , 10) |
| 5. legal stance on gifts of undivided shares in property. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 6. defendant's admission and claim relinquishment discussed. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 7. gift without consent invalid; courts misapplied law. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 8. final verdict on gift deed's validity against lower court rulings. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 9. second appeal allowed; judgment in favor of the plaintiff. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT :
KHATIM REZA, J.
This Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 04.05.2007 passed in Title Appeal No. 03/21 of 2005 by the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court-Vth, Bhabua, Kaimur, whereby, the judgment and decree dated 18.12.2004 passed in Title Suit No. 201 of 1996 by the learned Munsif, Bhabua, Kaimur has been affirmed.
2. The plaintiff’s heirs are the appellants and the defendant is the respondent in the present appeal.
3. The present appeal was admitted on 26.10.2009 and fo
A gift deed of undivided interest in joint family property is void without consent of other coparceners, establishing the necessity for immediate possession for validity.
The validity of a gift of ancestral property under Mitakshara Hindu Law can be voidable if made without consent from all coparceners, and challenges to such gifts may be barred by limitation.
A Kartha of a Hindu Joint Family cannot gift joint family property without the consent of other coparceners, rendering such a Gift Deed invalid.
A Kartha of a Hindu joint family cannot gift joint family property without the consent of other coparceners, as such gifts are void.
A coparcener cannot make a gift of his undivided interest in the family property, and a gift must be of a reasonable extent.
![N. Kalavathy VS Sriramulu Naidu [deceased] - 2023 Supreme(Mad) 1817](https://supremetoday-s3.b-cdn.net/Madras_2.png)
A managing member of a Hindu undivided family may validly gift joint property for charitable purposes without the consent of other coparceners, provided the purpose aligns with the definition of piou....
(1) Appreciation of evidence is an exercise based on facts and circumstances where preponderance of probability can take varying form and configurations.(2) Decision and determination of fact in issu....
A valid gift under Mohammedan Law requires declaration, acceptance, and delivery of possession, all of which must be sequentially satisfied.
The court ruled that disputed gift deeds require credible evidence for enforcement; joint property claims must prioritize actual possession and entitlement over mere assertions of gift.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
