Back
SANDEEP KUMAR
Awinash Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent
Sandeep Kumar, J. – Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.
2. This writ petition has been filed on behalf of above named petitioner for issuance of an appropriate Writ(s)/Order(s)/Direction(s) to the respondents for the following relief(s): –
(i) To quash the notification contained in memo no. 907 dated 10.11.2022 issued by the Additional Secretary to the Government, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, whereby and whereunder punishment of withholding of three increments with cumulative effect has been imposed against the petitioner. A copy of memo dated 10.11.2022 is annexed as ANNEXURE-P1 to this application;
(ii) To quash the appellate order contained in memo no.-415, dated 26.04.2023 issued by the Joint Secretary to the Government, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna whereby and whereunder the appeal preferred by the petitioner against notification dated 10.11.2022 (Ann-1) has been rejected. A copy of memo dated 26.04.2023 is annexed as ANNEXURE -P 2 to this application;
(iii) To direct the respondents to pay the difference of pay to the petitioner w.e.f. 29.12.2005 to 27.07.2018 after deducting the subsistence allowances which has a
The absence of a witness list in a disciplinary charge memo violates procedural fairness, rendering the proceedings invalid, necessitating adherence to natural justice principles.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
