IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
SHAILENDRA SINGH, J.
CWJC No. 9564 of 2021
(27.11.2025)
Chando Yadav ... Petitioner
vs.
State of Bihar & Ors. ... Respondents
National Highways Act, 1956 – Section 3A – Acquisition of land for construction of National Highway – When a land is required for the purpose of construction of a National Highway or part thereof by Central Government, then by notification in Official Gazette, Central Government shall declare its intention to acquire such land, and every such notification shall give brief description of land – Fact regarding land's nature as being Gairmajarua in revenue record on the date of publication is admitted – Instant matter involves disputed questions of title which require evidence, for which proper remedy available to petitioner is before Civil Court, as only after getting declaration of his title by competent Court in land in question, petitioner will be entitled to get compensation for land in question – Prayer made by petitioner in this application is not acceptable at this stage – Writ Petition dismissed. (Paras 6 and 7)
Shailendra Singh, J.—Heard Mrs. Nivedita Nirvikar, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mrs. Shashi Priya, appearing for the petitioner, Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, learned SC-25, appearing for the State-respondents, and Mr. Manish Dhari Singh, learned counsel, appearing for Respondent No. 6.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following reliefs:—
“(i) For issuance of a writ in the nature of writ of certiorari for quashing of the notification contained in the Gazette of India dated 31st January, 2019 issued from the Road Transport and Highway Ministry, Government of India, New Delhi, published in the Hindu daily "Hindustan" on 26th April, 2019, whereby the land of petitioner mentioned at Serial No. 103 in the village-Salempur having an area of 0.5348 Hectare Plot No. 102 has been declared as Gairmajarua (Govt. Land) while in earlier notification published by the Govt. of Bihar in the newspaper dated 10.06.2018 the aforesaid land was declared as private land required to be acquired for construction of National Highway No. 82 (Gaya Hisua Rajgir Bihar Sharif, Section).
(ii) For issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the Respondent Authorities to make necessary correction in the Gazette Notification dated 31.01.2019 and award compensation to Petitioner for acquiring his land mentioned at Serial No. 103 of aforesaid notification.
(iii) For issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the concerned authority to measure the land acquired for construction of National Highway 82 as per the sanctioned map without causing prejudice to any other residents of the locality.
(iv) For grant of any other relief or reliefs the Petitioner may be found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
3. Mrs. Nivedita Nirvikar, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, has argued that for the construction of National Highway No. 82 (Gaya–Hisua–Rajgir–Bihar Sharif Section), the land of the petitioner, which falls in Village Salempur, Police Station Mufassil, in the District of Gaya, was said to be acquired vide notification of the Government of Bihar published in the newspaper on 10th June, 2018. In the said notification, the petitioner’s land finds place at Serial No. 10, the nature of which was shown as private land, and a copy of the notification has been filed before this Court as Annexure-1. Subsequently, on 26.04.2019, in the Hindi newspaper namely Hindustan, the Gazette of India was published, in which it was specifically mentioned that after the publication of the said Gazette notification, the land mentioned would vest in the Central Government. The petitioner’s land finds place at Serial No. 103 in the said notification, but the nature of the land was shown as Gairmajarua (Government Land) in the notification, while in the earlier notification, the petitioner’s land was marked as private land. The petitioner was unaware of the new development and was waiting for notice from the competent authority of NH-82 for the payment of compensation in lieu of the acquisition of his land. It has been further submitted that the grand-father of the petitioner, namely Late Banwari Mahto @ Banwari Yadav, got his title in the land in question through settlement pertaining to Khata No. 73, Plot No. 102, having an area of 3.44 acres, from the ex-landlord, namely Govind Lal Nakfofa, and the ex-landlord had filed Compensation Case No. 105/2016, 53–54, in which the grandfather of the petitioner was mentioned as a settled raiyat. It has been further submitted that for the construction of an over-bridge at River Falgu, some portion of the land of Plot No. 102 was acquired in the year 1981, for which the petitioner’s uncle, namely Muni Yadav, was given compensation (award) vide Land Acquisition Case No. 5 filed by the State Government on 22.08.1996. The land concerning Plot No. 102 of Khata No. 73 was recorded in the government records in the name of the petitioner’s grand-fath
The court established that undisputed title is mandatory for compensation in land acquisition, affirming the need for appropriate judicial avenues for title disputes.
The court clarified that ownership disputes regarding land acquisition must be resolved by the competent revenue authority, not through a writ petition under Article 226.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of complying with the specified time frame for filing objections under the National Highways Act and the court's emphasis on the pub....
The deliberate failure to claim compensation for the land, despite being aware of the ownership and the opportunity to object to the acquisition, led to the dismissal of the Writ Petition.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.