Bal Manohar Jalan, Son of Late Hiralal Jalan vs State of Bihar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Pat) 33

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
JITENDRA KUMAR
Bal Manohar Jalan, Son of Late Hiralal Jalan – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate Ms. Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate Mr. Ritwik Thakur, Advocate Mr. Mudit Meet, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP

ORDER :

JITENDRA KUMAR, J.

1. The present Criminal Revision Petition has been preferred by the Petitioner against the impugned judgment dated 15.07.2019 and order of sentence dated 15.07.2019 passed by learned Court of Sessions Judge, Patna in Criminal Appeal No. 277 of 2011, whereby in pursuance of the Criminal Complaint bearing Complaint Case No.1375(C) of 2000 corresponding to Trial No.1243 of 2010, learned Court of Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Patna had found four accused persons including the Petitioner guilty under Section 323 and 384 of the Indian Penal Code and all the convicts were sentenced to R.I. for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- Under IPC and R.I. for three years and fine of Rs. 1,000/- under Section 384 . However, in the Criminal Appeal filed by four convicts including the Petitioner, the other three convicts were acquitted of all the charges but the conviction of the Petitioner, Bal Manohar Jalan was part set aside and part upheld. The Petitioner was acquitted of charge under , but he was found guilty under and even sentence under was modified by giving benefit by releasing him on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act and with direction to t