Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
ANSHUMAN
Abhinash Kumar Son of Bimal Kant Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar through Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. current decisions deemed per incuriam. (Para 6) |
| 2. court grants liberty to file civil suit. (Para 7 , 8) |
JUDGMENT :
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Counsel for the Central Selection Board (Constable Recruitment) and learned Counsel for the State.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was appeared in the examination of selection of Constable advertised in Advertisement No.5 of 2020 through Central Selection Board (Constable Recruitment). Counsel submits that his measurement was wrongly made and shown only 164.50 cm and subsequently upon oppose it was measured as 164.2 cm on the same day.
3. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that he has annexed the height measured by Medial Officer, Sadar Hospital, Bhagalpur, where his height was measured by government doctor is 167 cm. Counsel relied on the judgments passed by this Hon’ble Court in the case of Akshita Singh Vs. The State of Bihar decided on 03.12.2021 in CWJC No.14774 of 2021 and case of Raju Vs. The State of Bihar and others passed on 09.03.2022 in CWJC No.10956 of 2021 Counsel for the petitioner submits that in both cases a co- ordinate Bench of this Court directed t
Judicial discipline necessitates adherence to precedent, rendering prior favorable decisions per incuriam; the proper remedy for height disputes in recruitment lies in civil suits rather than writ pe....
Failure to explain delay in seeking redress can lead to the denial of relief in recruitment disputes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
