SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Cal) 281

MASUD
ELECTRIC LAMP (INDIA) PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE – Respondent


MASUD, J.

( 1 ) IN this Writ Petition Messrs. Electric Lamp Manufacturers (India) Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as ELMI) has prayed for an order in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to assess-and recover excise duties under Section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 on the manufacturing costs and manufacturing profits of the product of ELMI and also for an order restraining the respondents from levying and collecting any duty ELMI on the post manufacturing costs including selling costs or profits. The ELMI has also asked for a direction on the respondents to refund to it the sum of Rs. 1,98,40,969. 67 and interest on the ground that the said sum had been illegally demanded and collected from ELMI from 1961 till today. The facts of the case as set out in the petition may briefly be stated as follows :-

( 2 ) ELMI is a manufacturer of diverse electric lamps including fluorescent lamps and bulbs. The petitioner has been selling its products only to a limited number of customers such as "philips India Limited", Central Electric Company (India) Ltd. and Crompton Greaves Limited etc. The products are sold to these companies in accordance with their ord





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top