A.K.SEN
SUDHANSU SEKHAR MAITY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent
( 1 ) TWO notifications under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and two consequent declarations under Section 6 of the said Act are the subject-matter of challenge in this Rule.
( 2 ) IT would be necessary to set out the facts in short which are as follows. On May 5, 1959 a notification was issued by the State Government under Section 4 of the said Act. This notification merely recited that some land in the District of Midnapore is likely to be needed for a public purpose viz. , establishment of a subsidiary port at the mouth of Haldia river. This notification further authorised the Engineers of the Commissioners for the port of Calcutta and the Local Officers for the time being engaged on the undertaking to enter upon and survey land and do all further acts required for the proper execution of their work. The notification further laid down the route for the survey through the sixty-eight villages chronologically set out in the said notification. One of such villages is mouja Hatiberia Police Station Sutahata, District Midnapore. This notification was issued in terms of paragraph 13 and in form 2 of the execut
Referred to : Gadadhar v. State of West Bengal
Lekhraj v. Dy.Custodian, Bombay
Muhammad Qamar v. State of Bihar
State of Bombay v. Ali Gulshan
Radha Swami Satsang Sabha v. Tara Chand
Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation v. Income-tax Officer
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Vishnu Prasad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.