SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Cal) 257

H.K.BOSE, B.C.MITRA
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
KIRAN DEVI SINGHEE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.BHABRA, E.MAYOR, N.K.KHAITAN, S.MUKHERJEE

B. C. MITRA, J.

( 1 ) THE short point involved in this appeal is whether reasonable opportunity or being heard was given to the respondent by the appellant No. 1. , who issued a notice in writing in connection with a proceeding under Section 33-B of the Income Tax Act, 1922, (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). One of the notices issued by the appellant No. 1, in the circumstances hereinafter stated, was received by the respondent at Bldasar, District Churu, Rajasthan, on May 8, 1963. By this notice the respondent was informed that the date of hearing was fixed for May 9, 1963.

( 2 ) THE respondent, having her residence at Basirhat in the district of 24-Parganas, used to be assessed to income tax by the Income Tax Officer, B-Ward, Dist. 24 Parganas. The appellant No. 1 served a notice on the respondent informing her that on examination of the assessment records for the years 1953-54 to 1961-62 and other connected records, he considered that the orders of assessment passed by the said Income Tax Officer on June 14, 1961, were erroneous as they were prejudicial to the interest of revenue. In this notice various grounds for reopening the assessment orders for the above mentioned a


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top