SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Cal) 117

S.N.NIYOGI, R.N.DUTT
AJOY RAJ SINGH – Appellant
Versus
BAJ BAHADUR SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.DUTTA, S.S.MUKHERJEE

( 1 ) THIS Rule is directed against an order passed by the Additional Chief Presidency Magistrate, Calcutta making over a lorry seized by the police to the accused opposite party No. I on a bond.

( 2 ) THE petitioner filed a petition of complaint before the Additional Chief Presidency Magistrate, Calcutta making certain allegations of cognizable offences against the opposite parties in respect of lorry No. WGA 2079. The Additional Chief Presidency Magistrate without himself taking cognizance of the alleged offences directed the police to make investigation under Section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The police thereupon treated the said petition of complaint as the First Information Report and started investigation into the alleged offences. During investigation the police arrested opposite party No. I and seized lorry No. WBK 1425 from his possession. The next day, the police produced opposite party No. 1 before the Additional Chief Presidency Magistrate who granted him bail. The police simultaneously informed the said Magistrate about the seizure of the lorry and prayed for custody of the same which was directed to be kept with the police. Subsequently on February 1





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top